Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge Cohost feature branch into main #9786

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Merge Cohost feature branch into main #9786

merged 32 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

davidwengier
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #9519

Now that the initial cohost PR has been merged, we don't need to use the feature branch any more. That means this PR, which is big, but all of the code in it has been reviewed, in #9761, #9766 and #9767.

davidwengier and others added 30 commits December 23, 2023 22:03
In some respects this is a temporary thing until we get proper options support in cohosting, but in other respects having the service just take the one option value it actually needs is much nicer
This still leaves in place the text sync endpoints, and updates to the LSP servers
project system, so that everything else functions as expected
This also nicely lets us Find All Refs on the Cohost feature flag and see all of the code that can be deleted :)
Brings semantic tokens to cohosting, so there is an easy visual
indicator if things are working.

Right now colours are disco on first open of a file, but are fixed with
an edit. This is actually a good thing, as it will help me diagnose and
improve the document system in cohosting.
)

If nothing else, this cleans up the logs when trying to work out why
your cohost endpoint isn't working :)
Merged the PR from the couch thinking I'd actioned this feedback. Turned
out I'd made the changes on my other machine but hadn't committed 🤦‍♂️
…side of the world (#9766)

In theory this means the end of document sync issues forever!

In practice there is one fire-and-forget async method call here, from a
sync context, so edge cases will still creep in. But all of this code
should be deleted eventually anyway :D
PR feedback from a merged PR
@davidwengier davidwengier requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2024 05:10
Copy link
Contributor

@ryzngard ryzngard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe

Copy link
Contributor

@alexgav alexgav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@davidwengier davidwengier merged commit 55551d6 into main Jan 5, 2024
12 checks passed
@davidwengier davidwengier deleted the features/cohost branch January 5, 2024 02:42
@ghost ghost added this to the Next milestone Jan 5, 2024
@Cosifne Cosifne modified the milestones: Next, 17.10 P1 Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants