Add new batch ranking system #15
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Judges now submit their project rankings in batches (size specified on admin page). Judges rank a group of projects and submit this batch. This stops projects being overly penalised far down one judge's list while also making judging more manegable.
Stats are now better described (hopefully) as to what they actually mean. Old redundant stats (e.g. top project) have also been replaced/removed.
Some functions still need to be manually refactored to handle new object structure (2D/nested ranking lists because of batch system)
Had been incorrectly updated to a nested list structure.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because the developer (me) was very stupid this should only be merged after #14. I'm actually beyond silly.
Implements the new batch ranking system for Jury tailored for judging at DurHack. It is not yet feature complete and so does not yet fully address #4 which requires allowing judging to be ended 'early'.
But it does close #1.