[17138] Refactor of DynamicTypes

[MiguelBarro]

Description

Several works aimed to fulfill latest omg standard and fix issues.
Among them:

• Update the factories (DynamicTypeBuildeFactory and DynamicTypeBuilder) to enforced shared_ptr use and allocate in a single heap block.
• Reorder class hierarchy (TypeDescriptor, DynamicTypeBuilder and DynamicType) to enforce TypeDescriptor as state holder and remove redundant references and members. Avoid API implementation duplicates.
• Reduce the friend class device to a necessary basis and enforce class independence through APIs. This paves way to DynamicData class refactorization.
• Comprehensive annotation support.
• Enforce the use of static objects for primitive types as standard advices.
• Move serialization implementation to DynamicType in order to:
  • Make serializatio independent from DynamicData internals.
  • Double check by asserting each member type is the expected one.
• New test for primitives and complex aggregation types.
• Tests fixes and enhanced gtest support for comparisons via proper traces of the DynamicTypes.

Documentation update: eProsima/Fast-DDS-docs#479

Contributor Checklist

• Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
• The code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
• Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.
• Changes are ABI compatible.
• Changes are API compatible.
• New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).
• New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
• Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

• The PR has a milestone assigned.
• Check contributor checklist is correct.
• Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
• Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[MiguelBarro]

@richiprosima Please test this for me

[EduPonz]

Closed in favor of #4190