[21293] Fix destruction data-race on participant removal in intra-process (backport #5034) #5366
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR addresses a race issue happening in stressed intraprocess scenarios when
EDP's
writer intends to use the remote local reader pointer of an already removed participant. This happens because the participant hasn't received the other's one disposal yet (as it goes through transport).Some ci flaky tests have already been identified to be related with this issue.
The proposed solution introduces a new state in the Readers
LocalReaderViewStatus
in which the reader will notify that it is inactive as soon as it is destroyed and noone is using it.On the other side, the remote local writers using pointers to it, now holds a
LocalReaderPointer
which wraps the raw reader's pointer plus the view. An internal counter now accounts for the number of references.Thanks @MiguelCompany for helping with the final's solution design.
Note: the test may be launched with
--restest-until-fail 20
or so, in order to reproduce the issue. For a more frequent failure, review can launch thecolcon test
with thetaskset -c 0,1
prefix to make the test to stress more and make it fail more frequently.@Mergifyio backport 3.1.x 3.0.x 2.14.x 2.10.x
Contributor Checklist
Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
The code follows the style guidelines of this project.
Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.
N/A Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)
Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.
Changes are API compatible.
N/A New feature has been added to the
versions.md
file (if applicable).N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
Applicable backports have been included in the description.
Reviewer Checklist
This is an automatic backport of pull request #5034 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).