Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lang}[GCC/13.2.0,GCCcore/13.2.0,gfbf/2023b] SOCI v4.0.3, yaml-cpp v0.8.0, RStudio-Server v2023.12.1+402 w/ Java 11 R 4.3.3 #20060

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

lazariv
Copy link
Contributor

@lazariv lazariv commented Mar 7, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

Changes compared to RStudio-Server-2022.07.2%2B576-foss-2022a-Java-11-R-4.2.1.eb:

…13.2.0.eb, RStudio-Server-2023.12.1+402-gfbf-2023b-Java-11-R-4.3.3.eb
@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 7, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
i8022 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/f5a3f5f6ed2ab1c4b20df6022bfbf33d for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @lazariv FAILED Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total) i8022 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.8.13 See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/bf98d51fc59b2fd2fa6343ae9f471ccf for a full test report.

I suspect you have parallel installations there as the error complains about missing package "brio" in R

as for combining ECs for PRs: It is usually better to open individual/smaller PRs. You did that for R itself, so don't include that EC here in this PR. Same for libgit2 which is a dependency of R and also in that other PR. Having them in both PR results in needless and potentially conflicting rebuilds.

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 7, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
i8022 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/fe837b728a1a0c4beba72f3220ac7b64 for a full test report.

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 7, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
i8022 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/9adb3a1c254361eda6aaf015591123f2 for a full test report.

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 8, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
n1590 - Linux RHEL 8.7 (Ootpa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/e2acd25d64b09f3afdf3a5afff5df1ee for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @lazariv FAILED Build succeeded for 1 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total) n1590 - Linux RHEL 8.7 (Ootpa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470, Python 3.8.13 See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/e2acd25d64b09f3afdf3a5afff5df1ee for a full test report.

Only Boost/1.83.0 and PostgreSQL/16.1 is missing. Rebuilding with --robot should install those

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 9, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 7 out of 7 (3 easyconfigs in total)
n1590 - Linux RHEL 8.7 (Ootpa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/cf69a7c55bdf29cab9a387deb071ef16 for a full test report.

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented Mar 11, 2024

Test report by @lazariv
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
i8022 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/lazariv/9db90733135bf3c503dea714e5e0f466 for a full test report.

@lazariv lazariv requested a review from jfgrimm March 12, 2024 10:09
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 24 out of 24 (3 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/ed8bf4875f945baab24e0168fefe99dc for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20060 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20060 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13089

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1994339684 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/bdda13cd300a2c318e5b6cfadcf185eb for a full test report.

@lazariv
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazariv commented May 24, 2024

@jfgrimm anything should be done here?

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 27, 2024

@lazariv no, this looks ready to be merged. I'll send the last remaining mandatory test.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot May 27, 2024
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot May 27, 2024
@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 27, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20060 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20060 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13571

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2133791595 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/cc1c3c135fa670cb8bebf26caf92007b for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 27, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20060 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20060 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4225

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2134059566 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/b37d2f9d0084209b783fcaae93b34dae for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 27, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20060 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20060 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4226

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2134070963 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/664b18c5cf02d95aa394c3d271c948cb for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that in the meantime the tags of the rstudio repo gained the typical v prefix. No idea when that happened, but I had to update the tarball name of the sources.

LGTM

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 27, 2024

Merging, thanks @lazariv !

@lexming lexming merged commit 2c26f2f into easybuilders:develop May 27, 2024
9 checks passed
@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.9.1 milestone Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants