Non-separable wealth in utility, for its own sake or bequest motives #1365
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1365 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.33% 71.25% -2.09%
==========================================
Files 83 80 -3
Lines 13596 13710 +114
==========================================
- Hits 9971 9769 -202
- Misses 3625 3941 +316 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
alanlujan91
commented
Nov 28, 2023
| self.fPc = lambda c, a: (1.0 - gamma) * c ** (-gamma) * a**gamma | ||
| self.fPa = lambda c, a: gamma * c ** (1.0 - gamma) * a ** (gamma - 1.0) | ||
|
|
||
| self.uCD = lambda c, a: self.u(self.f(c, a)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
where is self.u defined? is it CRRA?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To be reviewed along with ConsBequestModel
@dedwar65 @ashishk87 please review