Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: sumac release support #124

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024
Merged

perf: sumac release support #124

merged 8 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

luisfelipec95
Copy link
Contributor

@luisfelipec95 luisfelipec95 commented Dec 19, 2024

Description

This PR aims to support the new Sumac release and removes tests and constraints for Python 3.8 due to compatibility issues.

Testing instructions

1, Create a Sumac environment using Tutor or TVM.
2. Install eox-tagging using this branch you can follow the official tutor documentation.
3. Follow the test cases file.

@luisfelipec95 luisfelipec95 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 21:48
Copy link
Contributor

@magajh magajh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@luisfelipec95 thanks, just a couple of comments:

README.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@magajh
Copy link
Contributor

magajh commented Dec 20, 2024

@luisfelipec95 why are we removing support for python 3.8 here? where you getting problems when trying to upgrade the requirements?

@luisfelipec95
Copy link
Contributor Author

luisfelipec95 commented Dec 20, 2024

@luisfelipec95 why are we removing support for python 3.8 here? where you getting problems when trying to upgrade the requirements?

@magajh https://github.com/eduNEXT/eox-tagging/actions/runs/12421325902/job/34680763565

@luisfelipec95 luisfelipec95 requested review from magajh and a team December 20, 2024 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

@magajh magajh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks good so I'm giving my approval

@magajh
Copy link
Contributor

magajh commented Dec 20, 2024

@luisfelipec95 have we tested this in stage yet?

Copy link
Contributor

@jignaciopm jignaciopm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! @luisfelipec95 @magajh i tested this in stage and all it great!

@luisfelipec95 luisfelipec95 merged commit 869e975 into master Dec 27, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants