Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixing Slashable Stake example detail #18

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

Fixing Slashable Stake example detail #18

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

wesfloyd
Copy link
Contributor

Please note the potential numbering mistake vs the diagram Op Set numbers:

image image

abbey-titcomb
abbey-titcomb approved these changes Jan 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@abbey-titcomb abbey-titcomb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but tagged @non-fungible-nelson for a review as well.

@MinisculeTarantula
Copy link
Collaborator

seems like the appropriate wording would be AVS 2, 3, and 4 can slash their associated Operator Sets 3, 4, and 5, respectively since Operator Set 6 isn't slashable at all

@non-fungible-nelson non-fungible-nelson merged commit 716bc7f into eigenfoundation:main Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@abbey-titcomb abbey-titcomb abbey-titcomb approved these changes

@non-fungible-nelson non-fungible-nelson Awaiting requested review from non-fungible-nelson

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@wesfloyd @MinisculeTarantula @abbey-titcomb @non-fungible-nelson