Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity from 1.7.0 to 1.8.2 #42690

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 13, 2025

Bumps github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity from 1.7.0 to 1.8.2.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity's releases.

sdk/azidentity/v1.8.2

1.8.2 (2025-02-12)

Other Changes

  • Upgraded dependencies

sdk/azidentity/v1.8.1

1.8.1 (2025-01-15)

Bugs Fixed

  • User credential types inconsistently log access token scopes
  • DefaultAzureCredential skips managed identity in Azure Container Instances
  • Credentials having optional tenant IDs such as AzureCLICredential and InteractiveBrowserCredential require setting AdditionallyAllowedTenants when used with some clients

Other Changes

  • ChainedTokenCredential and DefaultAzureCredential continue to their next credential after ManagedIdentityCredential receives an unexpected response from IMDS, indicating the response is from something else such as a proxy

sdk/messaging/azservicebus/v1.8.0

1.8.0 (2025-02-11)

Features Added

  • ServiceBusClient allows the endpoint to be overridden with ServiceBusClientOptions.CustomEndpoint, to use TCP proxies with AMQP. (PR#23843)

sdk/messaging/azservicebus/v1.8.0-beta.2

1.8.0-beta.2 (2025-01-14)

Features Added

  • ServiceBusClient allows the endpoint to be overridden with ServiceBusClientOptions.CustomEndpoint, to use TCP proxies with AMQP. (PR #23843)

Bugs Fixed

  • Receivers had a bug where a message could be received but not returned to the user. Callers would see that, occasionally, a message would not be returned from ReceiveMessages(), but would appear to have been received. Thanks to @​patrickwhite256 for reporting this issue. (PR #23929)

sdk/messaging/azservicebus/v1.7.4

1.7.4 (2025-01-13)

Bugs Fixed

  • Receivers had a bug where a message could be received but not returned to the user. Callers would see that, occasionally, a message would not be returned from ReceiveMessages(), but would appear to have been received. Thanks to @​patrickwhite256 for reporting this issue. (PR #23929)

sdk/messaging/azservicebus/v1.7.3

1.7.3 (2024-10-14)

Bugs Fixed

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 10:36
@dependabot dependabot bot added automation dependabot GitHub Dependabot labels Feb 13, 2025
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 13, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @dependabot[bot]? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 14, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 upstream/dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 branch from 36b8f4b to 4608c48 Compare February 14, 2025 16:40
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 18, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 upstream/dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 branch from d47185c to 40f6df8 Compare February 18, 2025 06:23
@pierrehilbert pierrehilbert added the Team:Elastic-Agent-Data-Plane Label for the Agent Data Plane team label Feb 18, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent-data-plane (Team:Elastic-Agent-Data-Plane)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Feb 18, 2025
@pierrehilbert pierrehilbert requested a review from zmoog February 18, 2025 07:18
@zmoog zmoog self-assigned this Feb 18, 2025
@zmoog
Copy link
Contributor

zmoog commented Feb 18, 2025

/test

@zmoog zmoog force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 branch from 8cbf5b5 to 506d35e Compare February 18, 2025 15:12
@zmoog zmoog requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2025 17:50
@zmoog
Copy link
Contributor

zmoog commented Feb 18, 2025

The azidentity package update in this PR also also brings in a version v1.10.0 of the github.com/stretchr/testify package.

The github.com/stretchr/[email protected] changed the behaviour of the require.NotSamef() function, and now tests fail if the arguments are not pointers. See stretchr/testify#1661 for more context.

@rdner, I updated a test you added ~two years ago, it would be great if you could take a look if I am not missing something!

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 19, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 upstream/dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2

dependabot bot and others added 2 commits February 19, 2025 20:40
Bumps [github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go) from 1.7.0 to 1.8.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/blob/main/documentation/release.md)
- [Commits](Azure/azure-sdk-for-go@sdk/azcore/v1.7.0...sdk/azidentity/v1.8.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@zmoog zmoog force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity-1.8.2 branch from 08089fb to 37c6734 Compare February 19, 2025 19:53
Copy link
Contributor

@zmoog zmoog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zmoog
Copy link
Contributor

zmoog commented Feb 20, 2025

Hey @elastic/beats-tech-leads, the PR is ready for your review! 🙇

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automation dependabot GitHub Dependabot Team:Elastic-Agent-Data-Plane Label for the Agent Data Plane team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants