Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Typos and Improve Grammar #1736

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ tags = [ "Wallet"]

```

By specifying the data as evolving config files in git, we benefit from a long term, auditable database that is both human and machine readable.
By specifying the data as evolving config files in git, we benefit from a long term, auditable database that is both human and machine-readable.

### Option 2: Complete the Ecosystem Submission form

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ github_organizations = ["https://github.com/EasyA-Community-Wallet"]

If you prefer videos, you can also see the above steps done live [here](https://www.loom.com/share/f23aab8c675940a9998b228ea1e179b7).

If you've been following along closely, you'll have noticed that the steps after adding the sub-ecosystem to the parent ecosystem are exactly the same a Option 1 (adding a totally new ecosystem that has no parents). That's because this taxonomy is based on ancestry. Any sub-ecosystem is basically just an ecosystem in its own right (it's not like a sub-ecosystem is any less valuable). The ecosystem and sub-ecosystem dichotomy is merely there so we can see the relationship between different ecosystems. You can keep adding sub-ecoystems to sub-ecosystems ad infinitum (forever).
If you've been following along closely, you'll have noticed that the steps after adding the sub-ecosystem to the parent ecosystem are exactly the same an Option 1 (adding a totally new ecosystem that has no parents). That's because this taxonomy is based on ancestry. Any sub-ecosystem is basically just an ecosystem in its own right (it's not like a sub-ecosystem is any less valuable). The ecosystem and sub-ecosystem dichotomy is merely there so we can see the relationship between different ecosystems. You can keep adding sub-ecoystems to sub-ecosystems ad infinitum (forever).


### Option 3: Adding a new repo or organization
Expand Down
Loading