Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.13.0 #1991

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 12, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.12.1 -> 8.13.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.12.1 -> 8.13.0 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.13.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [only-throw-error] add allow option (#​10221)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] add option ignoreBooleanCoercion (#​9924)
  • eslint-plugin: disable no-class-assign rule in eslint-recommended config (#​10250)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [switch-exhaustiveness-check] add support for covering a missing property with undefined (#​10232)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-definitions] don't leave trailing parens when fixing type to interface (#​10235)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] report when exported class implements/extends deprecated entity (#​10259)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] report on deprecated variables used inside dynamic imports (#​10261)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] falsey bigint should be falsey (#​10205)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.12.2

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [switch-exhaustiveness-check] invert considerDefaultExhaustiveForUnions (#​10223)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.13.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.12.2

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added Dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file T-Task Tasks for the team like planning labels Nov 12, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 2e8d52d to f85740e Compare November 12, 2024 15:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from f85740e to 08daceb Compare November 12, 2024 17:46
@t3chguy t3chguy marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2024 20:58
@t3chguy t3chguy requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2024 20:58
@t3chguy t3chguy self-requested a review November 12, 2024 20:58
@t3chguy t3chguy merged commit e1f5710 into develop Nov 12, 2024
37 checks passed
@t3chguy t3chguy deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch November 12, 2024 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file T-Task Tasks for the team like planning
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant