Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Element Call preview 2 #28585

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Element Call preview 2 #28585

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

hughns
Copy link
Member

@hughns hughns commented Nov 27, 2024

Checklist

  • Tests written for new code (and old code if feasible).
  • New or updated public/exported symbols have accurate TSDoc documentation.
  • Linter and other CI checks pass.
  • I have licensed the changes to Element by completing the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

As part of the effort to make room state more reliable, we're looking at changing how state is communicated to widgets. Rather than passing all state events from the timeline through (and forcing the widget to assume that they belong to the server's view of the room state), let's try passing only those state events through that we believe actually belong to the server's view of the room state. When combined with a matrix-js-sdk that supports MSC4222, this improves the reliability of state tracking for widgets.

We would like to later explore a solution that has a separate 'state update' widget action in addition to the generic 'incoming timeline event' widget action, to make the widget API better reflect the shape of the data sources that drive it (like the sync responses of Simplified Sliding Sync or MSC4222).
@toger5
Copy link
Contributor

toger5 commented Nov 27, 2024

I think here we don't want to update the js sdk. The one Robin is using in her PR is older than what we have on develop I think?
Let's check tomorrow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants