-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
Provide same servers
list in s2s alias results as c2s.
#18970
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jevolk
wants to merge
1
commit into
element-hq:develop
Choose a base branch
from
matrix-construct:alias_servers
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Afraid I'm not following how this improves anything, is there any chance you can sketch an example?
To put my confusion into words:
get_association
appears to just callget_association_from_room_alias
if the alias is managed by this server anyway.And if the alias is not owned by this server, we make a federation request to the server that does.
But why would someone be sending us an SS API query for an alias that we don't own?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the timely response 🙏🏻. To clarify, our high-level goal here is only to populate the response with extra servers. There is no intent to change the resolution process or answer queries on behalf of other servers.
I sympathize with your confusion as I just revisited
get_association()
myself just now. The branch entered if the alias is owned by the server to callget_association_from_room_alias()
does not return early. This allowsextra_servers
to be populated further down inget_association()
and that's what will achieve the goal here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, yup, not sure how I didn't see that. Yeah this looks sensible to me