-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Allow suppressing association key is nil
warning when preloading data
#4584
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tomconroy
wants to merge
2
commits into
elixir-ecto:master
Choose a base branch
from
tomconroy:suppress-preload-warning
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @josevalim, thanks for the insight here – you're right that this case fails. I dug into how the preload algorithm is working, and I understand now how it's building up a map of assocs using ids as keys, and in this case
nil
keys are causing things to break. We'd need to refactor this quite a bit to getnil
keys to work. I think a good first step might be to add simple test cases for preloading behavior (I didn't find this anywhere in the test cases), but I'm not sure the best way to do this. I tried using this:test_repo_all_results
to give the preloader some mock data... I'm having trouble getting it to work, but what do you think of this approach? Is there a better way to testRepo.preload
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to have proper integration tests but the issue is that I am unsure if this can work at all. If all of the primary/foreign keys are nil, we are simply incapable of putting things back to their places :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm imagining a way it should be possible to assign things using an alternative lookup mechanism than an
id
, if we know the structure is always nested structs/lists, we can find things using access patterns (keys, list positions)?In the meantime I'm trying to get a basic unit test working here where we have numeric ids, it feels my test case here follows existing examples of getting mock data from a query but I can't get this to actually work...