Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

caldav: support more features for recurring events #105

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bitfehler
Copy link
Collaborator

@bitfehler bitfehler commented Aug 31, 2022

The protocol allows clients to ask the server to e.g. expand recurring
events to a set of simple events in a given time-frame, so that the
client does not have to calculate the recurrences.

This commit adds the foundation for support for expand 1,
limit-recurrence-set 2, and limit-freebusy-set 3 functionality.
However, the actual transformation of events returned to clients will
have to be implemented in the backend, which now has the required
information to do so.

@bitfehler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is not finished, but since this touches the exported API, can you let me know whether this approach makes sense to you?

@bitfehler bitfehler force-pushed the bitfehler/recurrence-limits branch from eaba278 to ac2e356 Compare September 13, 2022 09:04
The protocol allows clients to ask the server to e.g. expand recurring
events to a set of simple events in a given time-frame, so that the
client does not have to calculate the recurrences.

This commit adds the foundation for support for expand [1],
limit-recurrence-set [2], and limit-freebusy-set [3] functionality.
However, the actual transformation of events returned to clients will
have to be implemented in the backend, which now has the required
information to do so.

[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4791#section-9.6.5
[2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4791#section-9.6.6
[3]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4791#section-9.6.7
@bitfehler bitfehler force-pushed the bitfehler/recurrence-limits branch from ac2e356 to a5ea3ab Compare September 13, 2022 09:40
@bitfehler bitfehler marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2022 09:43
@bitfehler bitfehler marked this pull request as draft October 31, 2022 11:12
@mikahozz
Copy link

Any plans or blockers to progress this PR? Support for recurring meetings would be awesome.

@jonyTF
Copy link

jonyTF commented Aug 18, 2024

Any plans or blockers to progress this PR? Support for recurring meetings would be awesome.

Seems like the other guy opened this pull request two years ago... but I just opened another pull request that adds the expand prop in #167, hope it helps!

@emersion emersion mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants