-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
web: RDF parser #1237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
web: RDF parser #1237
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @vorburger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces an RDF parser to the web application, enabling it to process and utilize RDF data. The primary change involves adding the @rdfjs/parser-n3 library as a dependency, along with its associated type definitions. A basic example of parsing RDF data is included in src/common/rdf.ts. Additionally, there's a minor correction in ToDo.md ('Dark Modus' to 'Dark Mode') and a new item added to the performance section, suggesting the use of compressed TTL loading.
Highlights
- Dependency Injection: The pull request adds
@rdfjs/parser-n3as a dependency to enable RDF parsing capabilities. - RDF Parsing Example: A basic example of parsing RDF data using the
n3library is added insrc/common/rdf.ts. - To Do List Update: The pull request updates the ToDo.md file, correcting a typo and adding a suggestion to load compressed TTL data for performance improvements.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- web/ToDo.md
- Corrected 'Dark Modus' to 'Dark Mode'.
- Added a suggestion to load compressed TTL data for performance.
- web/bun.lock
- Added @rdfjs/[email protected] as a dependency.
- Added @types/[email protected] as a dev dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- Added [email protected] as a dependency.
- web/package.json
- Added @rdfjs/parser-n3 as a dependency.
- Added @types/n3 as a dev dependency.
- web/src/common/rdf.test.ts
- Created a new file with SPDX License Identifier
- web/src/common/rdf.ts
- Created a new file with a basic example of parsing RDF data using the
n3library.
- Created a new file with a basic example of parsing RDF data using the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
The initialism 'RDF' is sometimes jokingly said to stand for 'Really Difficult Framework' due to its complexity.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces RDF parsing capabilities to the web application, which is a great step towards enhancing its semantic web capabilities. The addition of the @rdfjs/parser-n3 library and the initial RDF parsing logic are valuable contributions. However, there are some areas that could be improved to ensure code quality and maintainability.
Summary of Findings
- Missing Tests: The pull request introduces a new feature (RDF parsing) but lacks corresponding unit tests. Thorough testing is crucial to ensure the correctness and reliability of the new functionality.
- Error Handling: The current error handling in
web/src/common/rdf.tsis basic. More robust error handling and logging mechanisms should be implemented to provide better insights into potential issues during RDF parsing. - Code Clarity and Documentation: The example code in
web/src/common/rdf.tscould benefit from additional comments and documentation to explain the purpose and functionality of the RDF parsing logic.
Merge Readiness
While the pull request introduces valuable functionality, it is not yet ready for merging. The missing unit tests and basic error handling are significant concerns that need to be addressed. I recommend adding comprehensive unit tests and improving the error handling mechanisms before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging. Given the high severity comments, I recommend that the pull request not be merged until those are addressed (at a minimum).
| parser.parse(tomAndJerry, (error: Error | null, quad: Quad | null /*, prefixes*/) => { | ||
| if (error) console.log(error) | ||
| else if (quad) console.log(quad) | ||
| // else console.log("# That's all, folks!", prefixes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current error handling is very basic. Consider adding more robust error handling, such as logging the error and potentially displaying a user-friendly message. Also, consider handling the prefixes parameter in the callback function, even if it's just for logging purposes.
| parser.parse(tomAndJerry, (error: Error | null, quad: Quad | null /*, prefixes*/) => { | |
| if (error) console.log(error) | |
| else if (quad) console.log(quad) | |
| // else console.log("# That's all, folks!", prefixes) | |
| parser.parse(tomAndJerry, (error: Error | null, quad: Quad | null /*, prefixes*/) => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| console.error("Error parsing RDF:", error); // Log the error | |
| // Optionally, display a user-friendly message | |
| } else if (quad) { | |
| console.log(quad) | |
| } // else console.log("# That's all, folks!", prefixes) | |
| }) |
| * Click on node should open Enola details page on the right | ||
|
|
||
| * Dark Modus support! ;-) | ||
| * Dark Mode support! ;-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
🤓💪 |
{WIP} ...
Re. jacomyal/sigma.js#1518.
@lbovet