Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(docker)!: include support for buildx #50

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

esatterwhite
Copy link
Owner

@esatterwhite esatterwhite commented Mar 13, 2024

when the dockerPlatform array option is supplied and has a non zero
number of items, buildx will be used to build and push images rather
than the standard docker builder.

BREAKING CHANGE: images build with buildx will not be stored locally
BREAKING CHANGE: dockerVerifyCmd will only take effect during dry runs (--dry-run)

Fixes: #44
Fixes: #39

Refresh expired local certs for testing
@esatterwhite esatterwhite force-pushed the esatterwhite/buildx-support branch 2 times, most recently from 8b6c3b7 to 952d334 Compare March 13, 2024 20:20
@esatterwhite esatterwhite force-pushed the esatterwhite/buildx-support branch 2 times, most recently from 5933152 to ed0106a Compare March 22, 2024 18:38
when the dockerPlatform array option is supplied and has a non zero
number of items, buildx will be used to build and push images rather
than the standard docker builder.

BREAKING CHANGE: images built with buildx will not be stored locally
BREAKING CHANGE: dockerVerifyCmd will only take effect during dry runs (--dry-run)

Fixes: #44
Fixes: #39
@esatterwhite esatterwhite merged commit ccf9954 into main Mar 22, 2024
4 checks passed
@esatterwhite esatterwhite deleted the esatterwhite/buildx-support branch March 22, 2024 18:54
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can you specify the architecture of the image? Multi-Platform Docker builds
1 participant