chore: add format workflow
#104
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #104 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.96% 96.96%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 2111 2111
Branches 396 396
=======================================
Hits 2047 2047
Misses 63 63
Partials 1 1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
This PR has been automatically closed because we haven't received a response from the original author 🙈. This automation helps keep the issue tracker clean from PRs that aren't actionable. Please reach out if you have more information for us! 🙂 |
|
This PR has been automatically closed because we haven't received a response from the original author 🙈. This automation helps keep the issue tracker clean from PRs that aren't actionable. Please reach out if you have more information for us! 🙂 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since CI fails when the code isn't formatted correctly we shouldn't ever end up with wrongly formatted code in main?
And if we do, I would prefer an automated PR to be raised instead, like I did here: https://github.com/SocketDev/workflows/blob/fe40aa6135a5ea6d81ad8103e4f044d2f9227e41/.github/workflows/reusable-sync.yml#L182-L208
No description provided.