Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump cryptography from 2.4.2 to 3.2 in /cli (MEGH-1443) #30

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 27, 2020

Bumps cryptography from 2.4.2 to 3.2.

Changelog

Sourced from cryptography's changelog.

3.2 - 2020-10-25


* **SECURITY ISSUE:** Attempted to make RSA PKCS#1v1.5 decryption more constant
  time, to protect against Bleichenbacher vulnerabilities. Due to limitations
  imposed by our API, we cannot completely mitigate this vulnerability and a
  future release will contain a new API which is designed to be resilient to
  these for contexts where it is required. Credit to **Hubert Kario** for
  reporting the issue. *CVE-2020-25659*
* Support for OpenSSL 1.0.2 has been removed. Users on older version of OpenSSL
  will need to upgrade.
* Added basic support for PKCS7 signing (including SMIME) via
  :class:`~cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs7.PKCS7SignatureBuilder`.

.. _v3-1-1:

3.1.1 - 2020-09-22

  • Updated Windows, macOS, and manylinux wheels to be compiled with OpenSSL 1.1.1h.

.. _v3-1:

3.1 - 2020-08-26


* **BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE:** Removed support for ``idna`` based
  :term:`U-label` parsing in various X.509 classes. This support was originally
  deprecated in version 2.1 and moved to an extra in 2.5.
* Deprecated OpenSSL 1.0.2 support. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is no longer supported by
  the OpenSSL project. The next version of ``cryptography`` will drop support
  for it.
* Deprecated support for Python 3.5. This version sees very little use and will
  be removed in the next release.
* ``backend`` arguments to functions are no longer required and the
  default backend will automatically be selected if no ``backend`` is provided.
* Added initial support for parsing certificates from PKCS7 files with
  :func:`~cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs7.load_pem_pkcs7_certificates`
  and
  :func:`~cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization.pkcs7.load_der_pkcs7_certificates`
  .
* Calling ``update`` or ``update_into`` on
  :class:`~cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.CipherContext` with ``data``
  longer than 2\ :sup:`31` bytes no longer raises an ``OverflowError``. This
  also resolves the same issue in :doc:`/fernet`.

.. _v3-0:

3.0 - 2020-07-20 </tr></table>

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

> **Note** > Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 27, 2020
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title build(deps): bump cryptography from 2.4.2 to 3.2 in /cli build(deps): bump cryptography from 2.4.2 to 3.2 in /cli (MEGH-1443) Oct 27, 2020
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 3, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@solroshan
Copy link

Hello guys,
I monitored cryptography failure by cli/requirements.txt like topic and I fixed it with change cli/requirements.txt parameters as; cryptography==2.4.2 to cryptography>=2.4.2

Copy link

@solroshan solroshan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

= operator is suitable here.

@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ oauth2client>=4.1.3
click>=5.0
pyserial>=3.0
future>=0.15.2
cryptography==2.4.2
cryptography==3.2

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
cryptography==3.2
cryptography==3.2 cryptography>=2.4.2

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 30, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

15 similar comments
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 1, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 5, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 6, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 6, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 7, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 25, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 15, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 29, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 9, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 6, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 18, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 21, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 29, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 23, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 1, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants