Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note on value classes vs @newtype #71

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ addCompilerPlugin("org.scalamacros" % "paradise" % "2.1.1" cross CrossVersion.fu

For Maven or other build tools, see the Maven Central badge at the top of this README.

## Motivation

This is an alternative to scala's native value classes.

Why this is better than simply `case class Thing(value: String) extends AnyVal`?

That is because value classes [will sometime allocate](https://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/value-classes.html#allocation-summary).
In contratry `@newtype` is allocation free.

For more detailed comparison see https://failex.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-high-cost-of-anyval-subclasses.html

## Usage

For generating newtypes via the `@newtype` macro, see [@newtype macro](#newtype-macro)
Expand Down