-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clientv3test: add comments for clientv3test #16920
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NOTE: The
orderingKv.Get
doesn't have backoff try. It might make the test case flaky since the CI VM is unstable and the 1 second might be not enough for member[2] to get latest data.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think when creating this orderingKv object, we passed the retry function
NewOrderViolationSwitchEndpointClosure
when the Get fails, we will enter the retry based on
Am I understanding this correctly? The only thing missing might be an actual backoff function, as it is I think it immediately retries, not sure if that's what you meant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for unclear comment.
The
orderingKv
did retry immediately.However, the Github Action CI VM is unstable. When you recover member[2] from network partition and sleep 1s, it doesn't guarantee the member[2] can sync with leader during ordering's retry.
The Line 87
_, err = orderingKv.Get(ctx, "foo", clientv3.WithSerializable())
still might return error.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah that make sense. The idea is with default linearizable it will be forced to talk to the other members to ensure the most recent data is returned when
Get
is called right?Removed with
WithSerializable
option from the call. Let me know if looks good