How things are going regarding a Java application based on macOS Apps. Licensed under the MIT License.
The application is done by taking as the basis the work developed by Tobias Fischer.
The icone was created by Freepik - Flaticon.
CompactVD is another project I created in repositories. You have several folders in Java configuration and the en, fr, and pt-PT folders in macOS Resources AppName that is used for installation.
JD-GUI is an old project. It is based on the Java 1.8 version. You have universalJavaApplicationStub on MacOS and the en, fr, and pt-PT folders under macOS Resources AppName.
MultiFrame is the current project. There are en, fr and pt-PT folders in the Java configuration as well as in Resources in macOS AppName.
| macOS | AppName | Files | CompactVD | MultiFrame | JD-GUI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.12 Sierra | ✓ | ✓ | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8[+] |
| 10.13 High Sierra | ✓ | ✓ | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8[+] |
| 10.14 Mojave | ✓ | ✓ | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 10.15 Catalina | ✓ | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 11 Big Sur | – | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 12 Monterey | – | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 13 Ventura | – | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 14 Sonoma | – | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
| 15 Sequoia | – | – | 11+ | 1.8+ | 1.8 |
CompactVD=11+ means that this program requires Java 11 or later, while JD-GUI=1.8 means that the program requires Java 1.8 precisely. You can see which Java programs are installed on your computer using the command ls /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines
It seems to me that existing CompactVD settings don't justify adjacent folders, at least relative to the universalJavaApplicationStub.