Add EIP: NONREENTRANT and REENTRANT opcodes #15937
Annotations
5 errors and 2 warnings
Run ethereum/eipw-action@b8de7ea9ad5cb842301e63898afb996c451c18cf:
EIPS/nonreentrant.md#L18
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> EIPS/nonreentrant.md
|
18 | Reentrancy attacks account for a substantial portion of user funds stolen on EVM chains, including the famous "DAO hack" (a more complete list is available at https://github.com/pcaversaccio/reentrancy-attacks). However, due to the cost of preventing against reentrancy attacks in application code, developers often opt-out of reentrancy protection. This cost has come down with the advent of transient storage (EIP-1155), but it is still not cheap enough where it is a "no-brainer" to use it by default. This EIP proposes opcodes which make it cheaper to protect against reentrancy in application code.
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-[0-9]+`
= help: see https://ethereum.github.io/eipw/markdown-link-first/
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@b8de7ea9ad5cb842301e63898afb996c451c18cf:
EIPS/nonreentrant.md#L18
error[markdown-refs]: references to proposals with a `category` of `ERC` must use a prefix of `ERC`
--> EIPS/nonreentrant.md
|
18 | Reentrancy attacks account for a substantial portion of user funds stolen on EVM chains, including the famous "DAO hack" (a more complete list is available at https://github.com/pcaversaccio/reentrancy-attacks). However, due to the cost of preventing against reentrancy attacks in application code, developers often opt-out of reentrancy protection. This cost has come down with the advent of transient storage (EIP-1155), but it is still not cheap enough where it is a "no-brainer" to use it by default. This EIP proposes opcodes which make it cheaper to protect against reentrancy in application code.
|
= help: see https://ethereum.github.io/eipw/markdown-refs/
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@b8de7ea9ad5cb842301e63898afb996c451c18cf:
EIPS/nonreentrant.md#L18
error[markdown-rel-links]: non-relative link or image
--> EIPS/nonreentrant.md
|
18 | Reentrancy attacks account for a substantial portion of user funds stolen on EVM chains, including the famous "DAO hack" (a more complete list is available at https://github.com/pcaversaccio/reentrancy-attacks). However, due to the cost of preventing against reentrancy attacks in application code, developers often opt-out of reentrancy protection. This cost has come down with the advent of transient storage (EIP-1155), but it is still not cheap enough where it is a "no-brainer" to use it by default. This EIP proposes opcodes which make it cheaper to protect against reentrancy in application code.
|
= help: see https://ethereum.github.io/eipw/markdown-rel-links/
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@b8de7ea9ad5cb842301e63898afb996c451c18cf:
EIPS/nonreentrant.md#L1
error[preamble-req]: preamble is missing header(s): `eip`
--> EIPS/nonreentrant.md
|
|
= help: see https://ethereum.github.io/eipw/preamble-req/
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@b8de7ea9ad5cb842301e63898afb996c451c18cf
validation found errors :(
|
Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: actions/checkout@47fbe2df0ad0e27efb67a70beac3555f192b062f. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
|
The following artifacts were uploaded using a version of actions/upload-artifact that is scheduled for deprecation: "pr_number".
Please update your workflow to use v4 of the artifact actions.
Learn more: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-04-16-deprecation-notice-v3-of-the-artifact-actions/
|
Loading