-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update EIP-7201: Move to Last Call #7519
Conversation
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
The commit 9becbc1 (as a parent of 5207003) contains errors. |
This is ready for review @axic, @Pandapip1, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv |
Merged changes separately in #7529. Leaving this PR for the move to Last Call only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You'll need to complete the security considerations section before leaving draft.
EIPS/eip-7201.md
Outdated
status: Last Call | ||
last-call-deadline: 2023-09-15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally proposals go from Draft to Review, then to Last Call. Any particular reason you're skipping Review?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The EIP has been effectively in Review for months now. I recognize we should've formalized that in the status but I only realized once we wanted to move to Last Call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would be okay with moving from Draft
to Last Call
, but only if the deadline is a full month long.
EIPS/eip-7201.md
Outdated
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ title: Namespaced Storage Layout | |||
description: A formula for the storage location of structs in the namespaced storage pattern. | |||
author: Francisco Giordano (@frangio), Hadrien Croubois (@Amxx), Ernesto García (@ernestognw), Eric Lau (@ericglau) | |||
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7201-namespaced-storage-layout/14796 | |||
status: Draft | |||
status: Last Call | |||
last-call-deadline: 2023-09-15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
last-call-deadline: 2023-09-15 | |
last-call-deadline: 2023-10-7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've actively requested and received feedback for a while already as seen in the discussions thread.
We're going to release code using this EIP at the beginning of October so it will become de facto Final at that point, since as authors we're not going to accept normative changes after the code is released. I'll set the last call deadline to Oct 1st to match this reality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm okay with this irregular state transition given the longer last call deadline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
Is there an issue with the auto merge? |
I made a new comment about the standard here: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7201-namespaced-storage-layout/14796/11?u=mudgen |
@Pandapip1 Can you take a look at the auto merge? |
Agree it's a pain. For the moment can you submit a PR to move to Review first, and then we can merge the next PR to move it last call? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
The merge-base changed after approval.
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ title: Namespaced Storage Layout | |||
description: A formula for the storage location of structs in the namespaced storage pattern. | |||
author: Francisco Giordano (@frangio), Hadrien Croubois (@Amxx), Ernesto García (@ernestognw), Eric Lau (@ericglau) | |||
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7201-namespaced-storage-layout/14796 | |||
status: Review | |||
status: Last Call | |||
last-call-deadline: 2023-10-01 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
last-call-deadline: 2023-10-01 | |
last-call-deadline: 2023-10-09 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As mentioned earlier (#7519 (comment)) I didn't want to set the deadline beyond Oct 1st because we're doing a release that day and after that point as authors we won't accept normative changes to the EIP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving. Nit-pick: please don't forget to update. the Last Call Deadline.
If the merge was triggered immediately, please don't forget to create another PR to update the last call deadline date :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
Closed in favor of #7779. |
No description provided.