-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add EIP: Transaction Revert Protection #8267
Conversation
File
|
EIP-4337 to ERC-4337 Preamble add EIP Preamble over 80-columns for description/author for validation
The commit 5a72142 (as a parent of 75e0e5a) contains errors. |
Add EIP number Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
Fix discussions-to link (rename) Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
`0x05 || rlp([revert_protect, chain_id, nonce, max_priority_fee_per_gas, | ||
max_fee_per_gas, gas_limit, destination, amount, data, access_list, | ||
signature_y_parity, signature_r, signature_s])`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might be a bit too technical to add in the Abstract. Might be better to move it to Specification.
For example, an alternate p2p mempool strictly for `revert_protect` could be | ||
constructed where only 100 messages per second can be sent prioritized by the | ||
amount of ETH staked with a socially agreed timeout for these transactions | ||
(e.g. 10 minutes). More exotic constructions can constructed via accounting of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(e.g. 10 minutes). More exotic constructions can constructed via accounting of | |
(e.g. 10 minutes). More exotic constructions can be assembled via accounting of |
Might have missed a word.
There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review. |
yes i'am working busy
Vào CN, 2 thg 6, 2024 vào lúc 07:22 github-actions[bot] <
***@***.***> đã viết:
… There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be
closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR
forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment
indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for
a review.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8267 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BH4WUEIMT3UDPKD6OID7BATZFJQT5AVCNFSM6AAAAABD7JWETKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBTGY2DEOBQGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
some unaddressed comments |
state of the network. | ||
|
||
We introduce a new [EIP-2718](./eip-2718.md) transaction type, with the format | ||
`0x05 || rlp([revert_protect, chain_id, nonce, max_priority_fee_per_gas, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
transaction type should be left TBD and mentioned here as a parameter specified in a table as TBD
There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review. |
This pull request was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback or request a review in a comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍👍
Proposal to modify the Ethereum consensus for an opt-in transaction flag to define reverted transactions as invalid (cannot be included in a block).