Add EIP: Incentivize Access List Provisioning #8563
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To facilitate future developments of parallel data load, we need to encourage as many transactions as possible that contain as complete and valid access lists. Current access list pricing does not sufficiently incentivize their inclusion, and this EIP aims to address this gap. Co-authored-by: Ben Adams <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oleg Iakushkin <[email protected]>
renamed EIP file
github-actions
bot
added
c-new
|
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
eth-bot
added
e-consensus
|
The commit 18b28bf (as a parent of caf2c8a) contains errors. |
eth-bot
changed the title
abcoathup
reviewed
May 17, 2024
abcoathup
reviewed
May 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
MicahZoltu
reviewed
May 17, 2024
g11tech
reviewed
Jun 11, 2024
| the practical use is limited and uncommon due to the savings versus penalties involved. In order to break even for | ||
| each address included `24 storage keys` are required per address, and there is a `100 gas` saving per key at `25+`; | ||
| in contrast the penalty for including an unused key is `1900 gas`, so break-even where one key is unused is `43 keys`.\ | ||
| \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we remove these delimiters?
18 tasks
SamWilsn
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2024
| --- | ||
| eip: 7707 | ||
| title: Incentivize Access List Provisioning | ||
| description: This EIP proposes updating gas cost parameters for access lists to incentivise their use and improve transaction execution efficiency. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| description: This EIP proposes updating gas cost parameters for access lists to incentivise their use and improve transaction execution efficiency. | |
| description: Updates gas cost parameters for access lists to incentivise their use and improve transaction execution efficiency. |
Removed a bit of fluff.
| While [EIP-2930](./eip-2930.md) introduced `accessLists` as a mechanism for `SLOAD` | ||
| pre-warming to reduce gas costs by informing the EVM upfront about which storage slots a transaction will access, | ||
| the practical use is limited and uncommon due to the savings versus penalties involved. In order to break even for | ||
| each address included `24 storage keys` are required per address, and there is a `100 gas` saving per key at `25+`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only use backticks for inline code.
eth-bot
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To facilitate future developments of parallel data load, we need to encourage as many transactions as possible that contain as complete and valid access lists. Current access list pricing does not sufficiently incentivize their inclusion, and this EIP aims to address this gap.