Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-7637: Move to Review #8792

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 3 additions & 8 deletions EIPS/eip-7637.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Optimize EOA EXTCODEHASH
description: Modify the output value of EXTCODEHASH for EOA accounts to `0x`
author: Jame (@ZWJKFLC)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7637-extcodehash-optimize/18946
status: Draft
status: Review
type: Standards Track
category: Core
created: 2024-02-26
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -47,9 +47,7 @@ If someone uses a `add.codehash==0` to determine whether a contract has been cre

## Backwards Compatibility

<!-- TODO: -->
Needs discussion.
It is unclear whether there is a situation where codehash is actually used to determine whether an address has a balance and the codehash is `keccak256("")`.
Using codehash to determine whether a non-contract address has a balance will not be available


## Reference Implementation
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -93,10 +91,7 @@ def extcodehash(evm: Evm) -> None:

## Security Considerations

<!-- TODO: -->
Needs discussion.
It is unclear whether there is a situation where codehash is actually used to determine whether an address has a balance and the codehash is `keccak256("")`.

Using codehash to determine whether a non-contract address has a balance will not be available

## Copyright

Expand Down
Loading