Use 'proposal' instead of 'EIP' for no_backticks

ethereum · Oct 13, 2024 · 8fab180 · 8fab180
1 parent 24e5142
commit 8fab180
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/eipw-lint/src/lints/markdown/no_backticks.rs b/eipw-lint/src/lints/markdown/no_backticks.rs
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c> Visitor<'a, 'b, 'c> {
         self.ctx.report(
             self.ctx
                 .annotation_level()
-                .title("EIP references should not be in backticks")
+                .title("proposal references should not be in backticks")
                 .id(self.slug)
                 .snippet(
                     Snippet::source(&source)

diff --git a/eipw-lint/tests/eipv/markdown-malformed-eip/expected.txt b/eipw-lint/tests/eipv/markdown-malformed-eip/expected.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-error[markdown-no-backticks]: EIP references should not be in backticks
+error[markdown-no-backticks]: proposal references should not be in backticks
   --> input.md
    |
 18 | This is the motivation for the EIP, which extends `ERC-721`.

diff --git a/eipw-lint/tests/lint_markdown_no_backticks.rs b/eipw-lint/tests/lint_markdown_no_backticks.rs
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ hello
 
     assert_eq!(
         reports,
-        r#"error[markdown-no-backticks]: EIP references should not be in backticks
+        r#"error[markdown-no-backticks]: proposal references should not be in backticks
   |
 7 | `EIP-1234`
   |