Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experiments with jumpdest analysis #826

Draft
wants to merge 57 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Experiments with jumpdest analysis #826

wants to merge 57 commits into from

Conversation

chfast
Copy link
Member

@chfast chfast commented Feb 29, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.24138% with 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.94%. Comparing base (0de1555) to head (8a3c3e6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #826      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.98%   97.94%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         116      121       +5     
  Lines       11370    11950     +580     
==========================================
+ Hits        11141    11705     +564     
- Misses        229      245      +16     
Flag Coverage Δ
blockchaintests 59.75% <ø> (ø)
statetests 62.23% <ø> (ø)
statetests-silkpre 23.20% <0.00%> (-1.02%) ⬇️
unittests 96.32% <97.57%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
test/experimental/opcode_manip.hpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/unittests/jumpdest_analysis_test.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/experimental/jumpdest_analysis.hpp 92.85% <92.85%> (ø)
test/unittests/opcode_manip_test.cpp 88.88% <88.88%> (ø)
test/experimental/jumpdest_analysis.cpp 97.02% <97.02%> (ø)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant