Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evm daemon #891

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024
Merged

Evm daemon #891

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

SamWilsn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

petertdavies and others added 2 commits February 21, 2024 16:21
Starting the interpreter repeatedly probably takes a ton of time. By
starting a single process and reusing it, tests should be faster,
especially with JIT.
@SamWilsn SamWilsn changed the base branch from master to forks/cancun February 22, 2024 16:22
@SamWilsn SamWilsn marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2024 22:30
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.64%. Comparing base (bf47143) to head (25b394c).
Report is 39 commits behind head on forks/cancun.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/cancun     #891      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         69.96%   69.64%   -0.32%     
================================================
  Files               610      611       +1     
  Lines             34295    34898     +603     
================================================
+ Hits              23993    24306     +313     
- Misses            10302    10592     +290     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 69.64% <ø> (-0.32%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

blob_gas_used += self._module(
"vm.gas"
).calculate_total_blob_gas(tx)
ensure(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By @gurukamath in #889:

Based on the EIP, this check has to happen once outside the for loop, after all the transactions have been processed. But tbh, this makes more sense imo unless I am missing something.

@SamWilsn SamWilsn mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@petertdavies petertdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gurukamath gurukamath merged commit 5347460 into forks/cancun Mar 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@SamWilsn SamWilsn deleted the evm-daemon branch April 10, 2024 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants