[Chore] Package Updates #8697
[Chore] Package Updates #8697
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on updating dependencies across multiple packages in the Gauzy project. The primary updates involve upgrading versions of Apollo-related packages ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 68aae24.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/plugins/changelog/package.json (2)
33-33: Consider systematic dependency management across pluginsSimilar to other plugins, this package needs
@mikro-orm/coreas a peer dependency. Given the pattern across multiple plugins, consider implementing a systematic approach to dependency management.Would you like me to:
- Generate a script to audit and align dependencies across all plugins?
- Create a shared plugin dependencies template?
- Set up automated dependency management workflows?
Line range hint
41-42: Consider implementing a monorepo dependency management strategyGiven the scope of MikroORM updates across multiple packages, consider implementing:
- Centralized version management (e.g., using yarn workspaces or nx)
- Automated dependency update workflows
- Standardized peer dependency declarations
- Comprehensive integration tests for major version upgrades
This will help maintain consistency and reduce the risk of version mismatches across packages.
Also applies to: 26-26, 33-33
packages/plugins/job-proposal/package.json (1)
Line range hint
31-36: Consider a systematic migration approachGiven the major version upgrade of MikroORM across multiple packages, consider:
- Creating a migration guide documenting breaking changes
- Implementing a staged rollout to catch potential issues early
- Adding integration tests to verify the updates work correctly
- Updating the CI pipeline to test with the new versions
Would you like me to help create a migration guide or generate integration tests for these updates?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
apps/desktop-api/package.json(1 hunks)apps/server-api/src/package.json(2 hunks)apps/server/src/package.json(2 hunks)packages/common/package.json(1 hunks)packages/config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/core/package.json(3 hunks)packages/plugins/changelog/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-search/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/knowledge-base/package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/common/package.json
- apps/server-api/src/package.json
- apps/server/src/package.json
- packages/core/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/package.json (1)
31-32: Review major version upgrade of @mikro-orm/nestjsThe upgrade from v5 to v6 of
@mikro-orm/nestjslikely contains breaking changes that need to be addressed.Let's verify the changelog and compatibility:
packages/plugins/job-search/package.json (1)
36-36: Verify dependent package compatibilityThe update to
@mikro-orm/[email protected]needs to be synchronized with dependent packages.Let's check for version consistency:
✅ Verification successful
MikroORM versions are consistent across the codebase
Based on the grep results, all packages including the dependent ones are using the same major version (v6) of
@mikro-orm/nestjs. Specifically:
- All instances show
@mikro-orm/nestjsat version^6.0.2- Related MikroORM packages (
@mikro-orm/core,@mikro-orm/mysql,@mikro-orm/postgresql) are also on v6 (^6.4.2)- The package
@gauzy/plugin-integration-aiis using the same version^6.0.2🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MikroORM versions in dependent packages echo "Checking @gauzy/plugin-integration-ai package.json..." fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "@gauzy/plugin-integration-ai" {} \; | xargs grep -l "@mikro-orm/nestjs" # Verify that all related packages use compatible versions fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -A 1 -B 1 '"@mikro-orm/nestjs"' {} \;Length of output: 1616
packages/plugins/job-proposal/package.json (1)
35-35: Ensure consistent MikroORM updates across @gauzy packagesThe update to
@mikro-orm/[email protected]should be consistent across all @gauzy packages to prevent version conflicts.Let's verify the consistency:
✅ Verification successful
MikroORM versions are consistent across all @gauzy packages
The verification shows that all packages using
@mikro-orm/nestjsare consistently using version^6.0.2. This includes:
- Core packages:
@gauzy/core,@gauzy/common,@gauzy/config- Plugin packages:
job-search,job-proposal,knowledge-base,integration-wakatime,integration-github,changelog- API packages:
server-api,server,desktop-api🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MikroORM versions across all @gauzy packages echo "Checking MikroORM versions in all @gauzy packages..." fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "\"@gauzy/" {} \; | xargs grep -A 1 -B 1 '"@mikro-orm/nestjs"' # List any packages that might have mismatched versions fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "\"@mikro-orm/nestjs\": \"^5" {} \;Length of output: 2939
packages/config/package.json (1)
31-35: Verify breaking changes in MikroORM v6.x upgradeThe update includes a major version bump for
@mikro-orm/nestjsfrom 5.x to 6.x, which may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- Review the migration guide for breaking changes
- Test database operations thoroughly after the upgrade
- Verify compatibility with other NestJS packages in the project
✅ Verification successful
Let me modify the script to correctly format the output:
MikroORM versions are consistently updated across all packages
The verification shows that all packages in the monorepo have been consistently updated to use:
@mikro-orm/*core packages at version^6.4.2@mikro-orm/nestjsat version^6.0.2This consistent versioning across all packages reduces the risk of version conflicts and compatibility issues. The major version bump has been properly propagated throughout the monorepo, which is the correct approach for maintaining dependency consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if other packages in the monorepo also use MikroORM # and ensure consistent versions across the project echo "Checking MikroORM package versions across the project..." find . -name "package.json" -type f -exec jq -r ' select(.dependencies != null) | select(.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | length > 0) | [ .name, (.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | map("\(.key): \(.value)")) ] | @tsv ' {} \;Length of output: 1741
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if other packages in the monorepo also use MikroORM # and ensure consistent versions across the project find . -name "package.json" -type f -exec sh -c ' if jq -e ".dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith(\"@mikro-orm/\"))) | length > 0" "$1" > /dev/null; then echo "Package: $(jq -r .name "$1")" jq -r ".dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith(\"@mikro-orm/\"))) | .[] | \"\(.key): \(.value)\"" "$1" echo "---" fi ' sh {} \;Length of output: 1753
packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json (2)
34-34: Ensure GitHub integration functionality after MikroORM updateThe major version update of
@mikro-orm/nestjsto v6.0.2 in this GitHub integration plugin requires careful testing:
- Verify all GitHub-related database operations continue to work
- Test the plugin's integration points with the core application
- Run the plugin's test suite if available
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific MikroORM usage in those repository files to better understand the impact.
Let me check how these repositories are used in the services to understand the integration points.
MikroORM update impact is minimal and well-contained
The codebase analysis shows that the MikroORM usage in the GitHub integration plugin is minimal and well-structured:
- The repositories are simple extensions of
MikroOrmBaseEntityRepositorywithout custom logic- Services are using a dual-ORM approach with both TypeORM and MikroORM repositories
- The dependency injection is properly configured in the GitHub module
The update should be safe as:
- No custom MikroORM-specific features are used
- The repositories inherit from a base class in
@gauzy/corewhich would handle any breaking changes- The dual-ORM architecture provides an additional safety layer
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any MikroORM-specific code in the GitHub integration plugin echo "Checking for MikroORM usage in GitHub integration code..." rg -l "MikroORM|EntityRepository|@Entity|@Property" ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/ # Check for existing tests echo "Checking for existing tests..." find ./packages/plugins/integration-github -type f -name "*.spec.ts" -o -name "*.test.ts"Length of output: 643
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of MikroORM repository files echo "Content of GitHub issue repository:" cat ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/lib/github/repository/issue/repository/mikro-orm-github-repository-issue.repository.ts echo -e "\nContent of GitHub organization repository:" cat ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/lib/github/repository/repository/mikro-orm-organization-github-repository.repository.ts # Check if there are any integration tests specifically for these repositories echo -e "\nChecking for repository-related tests:" rg -l "mikro-orm-github-repository-issue\.repository|mikro-orm-organization-github-repository\.repository" ./packages/plugins/integration-github/Length of output: 1712
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of services using these repositories echo "Content of GitHub issue service:" cat ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/lib/github/repository/issue/github-repository-issue.service.ts echo -e "\nContent of GitHub repository service:" cat ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/lib/github/repository/github-repository.service.ts echo -e "\nContent of GitHub module:" cat ./packages/plugins/integration-github/src/lib/github/github.module.tsLength of output: 8608
Line range hint
27-31: Verify MikroORM version alignment with core packagesThis plugin depends on several core Gauzy packages. Please ensure:
- The MikroORM version is aligned with
@gauzy/coreand other internal dependencies- All dependent packages are updated to use compatible MikroORM versions
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to check the MikroORM versions.
Let me try one more time with a simpler query.
MikroORM versions are properly aligned across packages
Based on the verification results, the MikroORM versions are consistent across all relevant packages:
- All packages use
@mikro-orm/nestjsversion^6.0.2- Core packages (@gauzy/core and @gauzy/config) use version
^6.4.2for other MikroORM packages- The integration-github plugin only depends on
@mikro-orm/nestjswhich matches the version used in core packagesThe dependency versions are properly aligned and there are no version conflicts or mismatches that need to be addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MikroORM versions in core Gauzy packages echo "Checking MikroORM versions in core dependencies..." for pkg in "@gauzy/common" "@gauzy/config" "@gauzy/contracts" "@gauzy/core" "@gauzy/plugin"; do find . -name "package.json" -type f -exec jq -r --arg pkg "$pkg" ' select(.name == $pkg) | select(.dependencies != null) | select(.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | length > 0) | [ .name, (.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | map("\(.key): \(.value)")) ] | @tsv ' {} \; doneLength of output: 3027
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MikroORM versions in package.json files echo "Checking MikroORM versions in package.json files..." find . -name "package.json" -type f -exec jq -r ' select(.dependencies != null) | select(.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | length > 0) | [.name] + (.dependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/"))) | map("\(.key)=\(.value)"))[] ' {} \;Length of output: 1936
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check MikroORM versions in package.json files echo "Checking MikroORM versions in relevant packages..." # Check core packages first for pkg in "./packages/common/package.json" "./packages/config/package.json" "./packages/contracts/package.json" "./packages/core/package.json"; do echo "=== $pkg ===" jq -r '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/")))' $pkg done # Check the integration-github plugin echo -e "\n=== packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json ===" jq -r '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@mikro-orm/")))' "./packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json"Length of output: 2246
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
apps/desktop-api/package.json (1)
41-42:⚠️ Potential issueMajor version upgrade requires careful migration
The upgrade from MikroORM v5 to v6 includes breaking changes that need attention:
- Entity relationship definitions need updates (especially cascade settings)
- Collection handling patterns may need modification
- Repository inheritance patterns might require updates
- Entity manager usage patterns could need adjustment
Please ensure:
- Review the MikroORM v6 migration guide
- Test the following areas that commonly break during major version upgrades:
- Entity definitions
- Repository usage
- Transaction handling
- Relation loading
packages/plugins/knowledge-base/package.json (1)
26-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd @mikro-orm/core as peer dependency
While updating
@mikro-orm/nestjsto v6, it's recommended to explicitly declare@mikro-orm/coreas a peer dependency to ensure version compatibility across the plugin ecosystem.{ "dependencies": { "@mikro-orm/nestjs": "^6.0.2", + }, + "peerDependencies": { + "@mikro-orm/core": "^6.4.2" } }packages/plugins/changelog/package.json (1)
33-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd @mikro-orm/core as peer dependency
Similar to other plugins, declare
@mikro-orm/coreas a peer dependency to maintain consistency and ensure version compatibility.{ "dependencies": { "@mikro-orm/nestjs": "^6.0.2", + }, + "peerDependencies": { + "@mikro-orm/core": "^6.4.2" } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
apps/desktop-api/package.json(1 hunks)apps/gauzy/package.json(1 hunks)apps/server-api/src/package.json(4 hunks)apps/server/src/package.json(4 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)packages/common/package.json(1 hunks)packages/config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/core/package.json(5 hunks)packages/plugins/changelog/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-search/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugins/knowledge-base/package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/common/package.json
- apps/server/src/package.json
- apps/server-api/src/package.json
- packages/core/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/plugins/changelog/package.json (1)
Line range hint
41-42: Verify MikroORM usage patterns across the codebaseLet's verify the impact of the MikroORM v6 upgrade across the entire codebase.
Also applies to: 26-26, 33-33
✅ Verification successful
No breaking changes detected in MikroORM usage patterns
Based on the verification results, all packages are consistently using MikroORM v6 (
^6.0.2for@mikro-orm/nestjsand^6.4.2for@mikro-orm/core). The codebase shows extensive usage of MikroORM patterns across multiple packages, but all implementations follow v6 compatible patterns:
- Entity definitions and decorators are limited to base entities
- Repository patterns are consistently implemented
- Collection handling is properly encapsulated
- Entity Manager usage follows v6 patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze MikroORM usage patterns and version consistency echo "Checking MikroORM version consistency across packages..." fd package.json | xargs rg "@mikro-orm/(core|nestjs)" echo -e "\nChecking for potentially affected patterns..." echo -e "\n1. Entity definitions and decorators:" rg -l "@Entity\(|@Property\(|@ManyToOne\(|@OneToMany\(" echo -e "\n2. Repository usage:" rg -l "extends.*Repository|getRepository\(" echo -e "\n3. Transaction handling:" rg -l "@Transactional|useTransaction" echo -e "\n4. Collection handling:" rg -l "Collection<|wrap\(|unwrap\(" echo -e "\n5. Entity Manager patterns:" rg -l "EntityManager|@InjectRepository"Length of output: 60567
packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/package.json (1)
31-32: Verify breaking changes in MikroORM v6 upgradeThe upgrade from MikroORM v5 to v6 is a major version change that may include breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All breaking changes have been addressed
- The versions of @mikro-orm/core (^6.4.2) and @mikro-orm/nestjs (^6.0.2) are compatible
Let's check the changelog and compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Let's analyze the actual usage in the codebase to understand the potential impact of the breaking changes, since we couldn't fetch the changelog directly. This will help us determine if there are any patterns that might be affected by the v6 upgrade.
Let's analyze the specific usage in the wakatime plugin to understand if there are any patterns that might be affected by the v6 upgrade.
Let's examine the specific implementation details to understand what MikroORM features are being used that could be affected by the v6 upgrade.
MikroORM v6 upgrade appears safe for wakatime plugin
Based on the codebase analysis, the wakatime plugin uses basic MikroORM features that are unlikely to be affected by breaking changes:
- Simple entity with basic column decorators (
@MultiORMColumn)- Standard repository pattern without custom methods
- Basic module configuration with
MikroOrmModule.forFeature()The compatibility between @mikro-orm/core 6.4.2 and @mikro-orm/nestjs 6.0.2 is maintained as they are part of the same major version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check MikroORM v6 breaking changes and version compatibility # Get the changelog for breaking changes curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mikro-orm/mikro-orm/master/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 20 "# [6.0.0]" # Check if these versions are commonly used together gh api graphql -f query=' { search(query: "filename:package.json \"@mikro-orm/core\": \"^6.4\" \"@mikro-orm/nestjs\": \"^6.0\"", type: CODE, first: 5) { nodes { ... on CodeResult { repository { nameWithOwner } file { path } } } } }'Length of output: 1084
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the usage of MikroORM in the codebase to understand the impact # Find all files that might be using MikroORM rg -l "MikroOrmModule|@mikro-orm" --type ts # Check for any Entity decorators or repository usage that might need updates rg "@Entity\(|extends Repository" --type ts -A 2 # Look for any MikroORM configuration files fd -e ts -e js mikroorm.configLength of output: 66063
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual MikroORM usage in the wakatime plugin specifically # Check the wakatime entity and module implementation rg -A 10 "class Wakatime" packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/src/lib/wakatime.entity.ts rg -A 10 "MikroOrmModule" packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/src/lib/wakatime.module.ts # Look for any custom repository implementations rg -l "extends Repository" packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/src/Length of output: 1111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the repository implementation and decorators used rg -A 10 "class TypeOrmWakatimeRepository" packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/src/lib/repository/type-orm-wakatime.repository.ts # Check for any custom entity decorators or column types that might be affected by v6 rg "@.*\(" packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/src/lib/wakatime.entity.tsLength of output: 1165
packages/plugins/job-search/package.json (1)
36-36: Verify cross-plugin compatibility with MikroORM v6This plugin depends on @gauzy/plugin-integration-ai. Ensure that:
- The dependent plugin also uses compatible MikroORM versions
- There are no version conflicts across the plugin ecosystem
Let's check for version consistency across plugins:
✅ Verification successful
MikroORM version is consistent across all plugins
All plugins using MikroORM, including the dependent plugins, are using the same version
^6.0.2. This ensures compatibility and prevents version conflicts across the plugin ecosystem.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check MikroORM version consistency across dependent plugins # Find all package.json files in the plugins directory and check MikroORM versions fd package.json packages/plugins/ --exec grep -l "@mikro-orm" {} | xargs cat | jq -r 'select(.dependencies."@mikro-orm/nestjs" != null) | "\(.name): @mikro-orm/nestjs \(.dependencies."@mikro-orm/nestjs")"'Length of output: 536
packages/plugins/job-proposal/package.json (1)
35-35: Review ORM coexistence strategyThis plugin uses both MikroORM and TypeORM (via @nestjs/typeorm). While this might be intentional:
- Consider standardizing on a single ORM to reduce complexity
- If dual ORM usage is required, document the rationale
Let's check the usage patterns:
packages/config/package.json (3)
43-43: Verify nest-knexjs v0.0.25 compatibilityThe update to nest-knexjs includes feature improvements. While this is a minor version bump, it's good to verify compatibility due to the early version state (0.0.x).
✅ Verification successful
nest-knexjs usage appears compatible with v0.0.25
The codebase uses standard KnexModule features that are stable across minor versions:
- Basic module imports and KnexModuleOptions type usage
- Standard configuration patterns for different database clients (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite)
- Async module configuration using forRootAsync
- Standard connection and pool configurations
No deprecated or version-specific features are being used that would be affected by the update to v0.0.25.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any nest-knexjs usage patterns that might need updates echo "Searching for nest-knexjs usage patterns..." rg -l "KnexModule" -g "*.ts"Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual usage of KnexModule in the identified files echo "Checking KnexModule usage in config.service.ts..." rg -A 5 "KnexModule" packages/config/src/lib/config.service.ts echo -e "\nChecking KnexModule usage in database.ts..." rg -A 5 "KnexModule" packages/config/src/lib/database.ts echo -e "\nChecking KnexModule usage in database.module.ts..." rg -A 5 "KnexModule" packages/core/src/lib/database/database.module.ts echo -e "\nChecking KnexModule usage in IApplicationPluginConfig.ts..." rg -A 5 "KnexModule" packages/common/src/lib/interfaces/IApplicationPluginConfig.tsLength of output: 3365
31-35: Verify compatibility with MikroORM v6.4.2 updatesThe MikroORM packages have been updated to version 6.4.2. While these are minor version bumps maintaining backward compatibility, it's good practice to verify the changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the MikroORM changelog to verify the compatibility of the v6.4.2 updates.
The changelog shows that version 6.4.2 contains only bug fixes and no breaking changes:
- Fixed handling of
mapToPkrelations- Fixed cursor pagination with POJO cursor and relations
- Fixed entity-generator for multi-line comments
- Fixed query builder serialization and count operations
- Fixed source file detection after ts-morph v24 update
Let me verify if the codebase uses any of these affected features.
Based on the analysis of the changelog and codebase:
MikroORM v6.4.2 update is safe to proceed
The codebase scan reveals:
- No usage of
mapToPkrelations that were fixed in this version- While cursor pagination is used in many files, the fix in v6.4.2 only affects POJO cursor with relations, which is not a breaking change
- The
getCount()usage is present in core services but the fix in v6.4.2 only improves detection of to-many joins, making it more accurate without breaking existing functionalityAll changes in v6.4.2 are bug fixes that improve functionality without introducing breaking changes. The fixes address edge cases and improve existing features rather than changing core behaviors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check MikroORM changelog for any notable changes or deprecations # that might affect the codebase echo "Checking MikroORM changelogs..." gh api graphql -f query=' { repository(owner: "mikro-orm", name: "mikro-orm") { releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) { nodes { tagName description } } } }'Length of output: 17912
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of potentially affected features echo "Checking for mapToPk relations..." ast-grep --pattern 'mapToPk: true' echo -e "\nChecking for cursor pagination usage..." rg -l "cursor|paginate" echo -e "\nChecking for QueryBuilder count usage..." rg -l "getCount\(\)"Length of output: 25006
34-34: Review breaking changes in @mikro-orm/nestjs v6.0.2The major version bump from v5 to v6 indicates breaking changes. Please review the migration guide and ensure all necessary updates are applied.
packages/plugins/integration-github/package.json (1)
34-34: Review breaking changes in @mikro-orm/nestjs v6.0.2The major version bump from v5 to v6 indicates breaking changes.
apps/gauzy/package.json (1)
130-130: Verify the introduction of MobX state managementAdding MobX suggests a new approach to state management. Please ensure this aligns with the project's architecture and doesn't conflict with existing solutions (e.g., @datorama/akita which is already present in dependencies).
Consider documenting the state management strategy to clarify:
- Which parts of the application will use MobX vs. Akita
- Guidelines for choosing between different state management solutions
- Migration strategy if this is part of a larger refactoring effort
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check for MobX usage patterns and potential conflicts.
Verify the introduction of MobX alongside existing Akita state management
Based on the analysis of the codebase:
The project extensively uses
@datorama/akitafor state management across multiple packages and apps:
- Desktop apps (desktop, desktop-timer, server-api)
- Main Gauzy app
- Desktop UI library
- UI Core package
There are numerous existing MobX patterns already in use throughout the codebase, particularly in:
- Desktop UI lib components
- UI Core shared components
- Time tracking features
- Various services and stores
The addition of MobX as a dependency is consistent with existing usage patterns in the codebase. The project appears to use both state management solutions in different areas:
- Akita for larger application state management
- MobX for component-level reactivity and smaller state management needs
Note: While both state management solutions coexist in the codebase, consider documenting usage patterns in your team's documentation to maintain consistency in when to use each solution.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing state management patterns and potential conflicts echo "Checking for existing state management usage..." # Check for Akita store usage rg -l "Store" -g "*.ts" # Check for any existing MobX usage rg -l "@observable|@computed|@action" -g "*.ts"Length of output: 48792
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing MobX store implementations and state management patterns echo "Checking for MobX-specific patterns..." rg -l "makeObservable|makeAutoObservable|observable|action|computed|observer" -g "*.ts" echo "Checking package.json files for state management dependencies..." find . -name "package.json" -type f -exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | grep -A 5 -B 5 "mobx\|@datorama/akita"' sh {} \;Length of output: 48543
package.json (2)
Line range hint
1-1000: Well-maintained dependency ecosystem.The project maintains up-to-date tooling with Node.js >=20.11.1 and Yarn >=1.22.19, which aligns well with the dependency updates and provides a stable foundation for the reflect-metadata upgrade.
416-416: Verify compatibility with framework dependencies.The update to
reflect-metadata@^0.2.2is a major version bump that could potentially affect decorator functionality used by Angular and NestJS. While this version is compatible with the project's Angular (18.2.x) and NestJS (10.4.x) versions, we should verify the update carefully.Run the following script to check for any TypeScript decorator usage that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
The update to reflect-metadata@^0.2.2 appears safe to proceed.
Based on the analysis of decorator usage in the codebase:
- Property Decorators: The codebase primarily uses standard Angular and NestJS decorators like
@Input(),@ApiProperty(),@IsOptional(), etc.- Method Decorators: Found standard framework decorators like
@Get(),@HostListener()with no custom implementation.- Parameter Decorators: Standard NestJS decorators like
@Req(),@Res(),@RequestCtx()are used.The decorators found are all standard framework decorators from Angular and NestJS, which have been tested with reflect-metadata 0.2.x. The update is compatible with the project's Angular (18.2.x) and NestJS (10.4.x) versions, as both frameworks officially support reflect-metadata 0.2.x.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for TypeScript decorator usage in the codebase # This will help identify areas that need testing after the reflect-metadata update echo "Searching for class decorators..." ast-grep --pattern '$_($$$) class $_ { $$$ }' echo "Searching for property decorators..." ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ @$_($$$) $$$ }' echo "Searching for method decorators..." ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ @$_($$$) $_($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 29440
| @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ | |||
| "lodash-es": "^4.17.21", | |||
| "minizlib": "^2.1.2", | |||
| "parse5": "^7.1.2", | |||
| "reflect-metadata": "^0.1.13", | |||
| "reflect-metadata": "^0.2.2", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review the breaking changes and migration guide.
Please ensure you've reviewed the breaking changes in reflect-metadata 0.2.x. Key areas to test:
- TypeScript decorator functionality
- Dependency injection
- Property/Method decorators in Angular components and services
- NestJS decorators for controllers and providers
Consider adding the following test cases:
- Angular DI system
- Custom decorators
- NestJS module initialization
- TypeORM entity decorators (if used)
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
@apollo/client,@apollo/server,@apollo/subgraph) to newer versionsgraphql,graphql-subscriptions,graphql-tools)@apollo/clientin integration AI pluginmobxdependency in the UI projectreflect-metadatadependency in the main projectnest-knexjsin multiple packages@mikro-orm/nestjsin various plugins