bug: fix the comments length issue #59
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as "Client/Caller"
participant ImageService as "ImageService"
participant DB as "Database"
Client->>ImageService: Call getFiles(uid, id)
ImageService->>DB: Retrieve comments from `users/{uid}/videos/{id}/comments`
DB-->>ImageService: Return comments data
ImageService->>ImageService: Process data (sanitizeCommentsFromDB)
ImageService-->>Client: Return processed comments
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin". (The package "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/apps/api".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin" was referenced from the config file in "apps/api/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts (1)
378-378: Remove debugging console log.This console log statement seems to be used for debugging purposes. Remove it before deploying to production to prevent unnecessary console output.
-console.log('value:', uid);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts (2)
430-430: Ensure proper handling of undefined comments.Line 430 uses
allComments.lengthto set thecommentsLengthproperty. Ensure thatallCommentsis always defined, even if no comments are retrieved from the database, to prevent potential undefined errors.
406-412:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the comments data path.
The code fetches comments from
users/${uid}/videos/${id}/commentswhile this is in theImageServiceclass. Ensure this is the correct path for image comments, as the naming suggests it might be related to videos rather than images.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any other references to comments paths in the codebase # to verify the correct path pattern echo "Checking references to comments paths in the codebase..." # Look for other references to comments in database rg "db\.ref\(.*?comments" --type ts # Look for any image comments references rg "images?.*?comments" --type ts # Look for any video comments references rg "videos?.*?comments" --type tsLength of output: 4159
Action Required: Verify the Database Path for Comments in ImageService
The code in
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts(lines 406-412) is fetching comments using the pathusers/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments. Since this is within the ImageService, it’s worth verifying whether this path is intentional or if it should instead reference images (e.g.,users/${uid}/images/${id}/comments). The grep output only confirms that within this file, the videos path is used when fetching comments, while other parts of the codebase reference comments under image-related paths differently. Please review and update the database reference if necessary.
- File to Check:
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts- Snippet Under Review:
const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); const newComments = await comments.get(); const gettedComments = newComments.val(); const allComments = this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(gettedComments); console.log('newComments:', allComments);- Action: Confirm whether image comments should indeed be located under the
videossubtree. If not, adjust the path accordingly.
| const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); | ||
| const newComments = await comments.get(); | ||
| const gettedComments = newComments.val(); | ||
|
|
||
| const allComments = | ||
| this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(gettedComments); | ||
| console.log('newComments:', allComments); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve variable naming and remove debugging log.
The code now correctly fetches comments from the database, but has a few issues:
- Variable naming:
gettedCommentsis not standard English - Lacks null/undefined check before processing comments
- Contains debugging console log
const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`);
const newComments = await comments.get();
-const gettedComments = newComments.val();
+const retrievedComments = newComments.val();
const allComments =
- this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(gettedComments);
+ this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(retrievedComments || {});
-console.log('newComments:', allComments);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); | |
| const newComments = await comments.get(); | |
| const gettedComments = newComments.val(); | |
| const allComments = | |
| this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(gettedComments); | |
| console.log('newComments:', allComments); | |
| const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); | |
| const newComments = await comments.get(); | |
| const retrievedComments = newComments.val(); | |
| const allComments = | |
| this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB(retrievedComments || {}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ export class ImageService { | |||
| const dbImages = db.ref(`users/${uid}/screenshots`); | |||
| let imagesQuery = dbImages.orderByChild('parentId'); | |||
|
|
|||
| console.log('value:', uid); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts (1)
405-411: Ensure consistent error handling for comment retrieval.The code now correctly fetches comments from the database with proper variable naming and null checks, which aligns with the PR objective to fix the comments length issue. However, the method doesn't handle potential errors during comment retrieval specifically.
Consider adding try-catch for the comment retrieval to handle specific errors:
-const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); -const newComments = await comments.get(); -const retrievedComments = newComments.val(); - -const allComments = this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB( - retrievedComments || {}, -); +let allComments = []; +try { + const comments = db.ref(`users/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments`); + const newComments = await comments.get(); + const retrievedComments = newComments.val(); + + allComments = this.sharedService.sanitizeCommentsFromDB( + retrievedComments || {}, + ); +} catch (error) { + console.log(`Error retrieving comments for ${id}:`, error); + allComments = []; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/api/src/module/image/image.service.ts (1)
405-411:❓ Verification inconclusive
Path inconsistency in comments retrieval.
The code retrieves comments from
users/${uid}/videos/${id}/commentswhich is inconsistent with other paths in the file that use "screenshots" for images. The method is part ofImageServicebut is accessing a path that includes "videos".
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other references to "videos" path in the codebase to verify if this is intentional # Look for other references to videos path in the codebase rg "videos/\$\{id\}/comments" --type ts rg "screenshots/\$\{id\}/comments" --type ts # Check if comments are stored in both locations ast-grep --pattern $'db.ref(`users/${$_}/screenshots/${$_}/comments`)'Length of output: 158
Action Required: Verify Path Consistency for Comments Retrieval
The
ImageServiceis currently fetching comments fromusers/${uid}/videos/${id}/comments, whereas other parts of the module handle images using paths with"screenshots". This discrepancy suggests that the"videos"path might be a mistake. Please verify whether the comments for images are intended to be stored under"screenshots"and, if so, update the path accordingly.
- Confirm if the correct storage should use
"screenshots"(e.g.,users/${uid}/screenshots/${id}/comments).- Adjust the code for consistent path usage in the service if necessary.
Summary by CodeRabbit