[Fix]: Status Assignment Issue From Dropdown #3504
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTaskStatus.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.46.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses multiple minor modifications across various components in the web application. The changes primarily involve formatting adjustments, event handling improvements, and subtle logic refinements in components related to task status, color picking, modals, and settings. The modifications focus on enhancing code readability, preventing event propagation, and streamlining data loading processes without significantly altering core functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Report too large to display inline |
|
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next stepsWhat are http dependencies?Contains a dependency which resolves to a remote HTTP URL which could be used to inject untrusted code and reduce overall package reliability. Publish the HTTP URL dependency to npm or a private package repository and consume it from there. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status-modal.tsx (1)
84-90: LGTM! Consider using a reusable event handler.The addition of event handlers to prevent propagation is correct and addresses potential event bubbling issues. However, the implementation could be more DRY.
Consider consolidating the repeated event handlers into a single reusable function:
+const stopPropagation = (e: React.SyntheticEvent) => e.stopPropagation(); + <div className="w-[98%] md:w-[33rem]" - onClick={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} - onMouseDown={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} - onMouseUp={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} - onPointerDown={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} - onPointerUp={(e) => e.stopPropagation()} + onClick={stopPropagation} + onMouseDown={stopPropagation} + onMouseUp={stopPropagation} + onPointerDown={stopPropagation} + onPointerUp={stopPropagation} >apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (1)
233-236: Consider using a more efficient comparison method.While
JSON.stringifyworks for array comparison, it's not the most efficient approach. Consider using array-specific comparison methods or libraries likelodash.isEqualfor better performance.- if (defaultValues.length > 0 && JSON.stringify(values) !== JSON.stringify(defaultValues)) { + if (defaultValues.length > 0 && !values.every((v, i) => v === defaultValues[i]) || values.length !== defaultValues.length) {apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTaskStatus.ts (1)
66-69: LGTM! Consider memoization for optimization.The simplified logic improves maintainability. However, if performance becomes a concern due to frequent re-renders, consider memoizing the task status data using
useMemoor implementing a shallow comparison.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTaskStatus.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/components/color-picker.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/components/modal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/task/task-input.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status-modal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx(11 hunks)apps/web/lib/settings/icon-popover.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/settings/personal-setting-form.tsx(4 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-input.tsx
- apps/web/lib/components/modal.tsx
- apps/web/lib/settings/personal-setting-form.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: deploy
- GitHub Check: deploy
- GitHub Check: Socket Security: Pull Request Alerts
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/web/lib/components/color-picker.tsx (1)
70-70: LGTM! Consistent event handling and improved formatting.The changes align with the event handling improvements across components and improve code readability through better className formatting.
Also applies to: 81-82
apps/web/lib/settings/icon-popover.tsx (1)
37-37: LGTM! Consistent event handling implementation.The addition of onProgressCapture handler maintains consistency with other components using Popover.
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (5)
100-100: LGTM!The reordering of Tailwind CSS classes doesn't affect the styling output.
213-214: Good separation of concerns!Separating the raw name from its display format improves maintainability and makes status comparisons more reliable.
221-224: Enhanced item lookup logic!Checking both value and name properties makes the item lookup more robust and helps prevent status assignment issues.
227-230: Good performance optimization!Preventing unnecessary state updates by checking if the value has changed follows React best practices.
241-250: Improved selection handling logic!The changes make both single and multiple selection handling clearer and more maintainable.
Also applies to: 253-253, 256-256
apps/web/package.json (1)
41-41: Verify the Jitsi SDK version update.Please ensure that the update to
@jitsi/[email protected]doesn't introduce any breaking changes and check the changelog for any security fixes.✅ Verification successful
The Jitsi SDK version update appears safe to proceed with.
The update from ^1.3.0 to ^1.4.0 follows semantic versioning conventions, indicating backward-compatible changes. No security vulnerabilities were found. As always, verify the integration through your standard testing procedures.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes and security advisories in @jitsi/react-sdk # Check for security advisories gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@jitsi/react-sdk") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } }' # Get the latest version information from npm curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@jitsi/react-sdk | jq '.versions["1.4.0"].dependencies'Length of output: 446
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Try alternative approaches to get package information # Check if package-lock.json exists and get version details fd package-lock.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r ".[\"packages\"][\"node_modules/@jitsi/react-sdk\"]"' sh {} # Try alternative npm registry endpoint curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@jitsi/react-sdk/1.4.0 | jq '{ version: .version, description: .description, date: .time, repository: .repository.url }'Length of output: 538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check repository releases and tags # Try to get release information gh api repos/jitsi/jitsi-meet-web-sdk/releases/tags/1.4.0 | jq '{ name: .name, body: .body, published_at: .published_at }' # Fetch recent tags for version context gh api repos/jitsi/jitsi-meet-web-sdk/tags | jq '.[0:5] | map({name, commit: .commit.sha})'Length of output: 751
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTaskStatus.ts (1)
78-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify potential race condition between useEffect hooks.
This useEffect and the previous one (lines 71-75) could both trigger
loadTaskStatusData()simultaneously when the component first mounts. Consider:
- Merging the conditions into a single useEffect
- Or adding a guard in
loadTaskStatusDatato prevent concurrent callsExample of merging conditions:
useEffect(() => { const teamIdFromCookie = getActiveTeamIdCookie(); - if (user?.tenantId && (activeTeamId || teamIdFromCookie)) { + if ((user?.tenantId && (activeTeamId || teamIdFromCookie)) || firstLoad) { loadTaskStatusData(); } - }, [user?.tenantId, activeTeamId, loadTaskStatusData]); + }, [user?.tenantId, activeTeamId, loadTaskStatusData, firstLoad]); - useEffect(() => { - if (firstLoad) { - loadTaskStatusData(); - } - }, [loadTaskStatusData, firstLoad]);Let's verify if there are any existing issues or race conditions:
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
#3464
Type of Change
Checklist
Previous screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
Current screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependencies
Performance & Optimization
UI Enhancements
Bug Fixes