Exchange dead link for 'with'

[angelikatyborska]

This was the original: https://web.archive.org/web/20150511141513/http://twitter.com/@Joseph_Kain

It's from 2015 and talks about version 1.2 being upcoming 😁 maybe not the best message for beginners. So I decided against linking to its wayback machine copy, and just find a new link.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

• General steps

  • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)

• Concept changed

  • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <concept>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
  • 📖 Does the concept introduction provide all necessary information to solve this exercise?

---

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

[jiegillet]

Nice, thank you!

This was the original: https://web.archive.org/web/20150511141513/http://twitter.com/@Joseph_Kain

I don't see anything there.

Anyway, the new link is fine.
How would you feel about adding this link https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/main/code-anti-patterns.html#complex-else-clauses-in-with ?
Mentioning an anti-pattern while people are still learning seems like a good idea

[angelikatyborska]

Sorry, I accidentally linked to the guy's twitter account. That was the original: https://web.archive.org/web/20221206143050/http://learningelixir.joekain.com/learning-elixir-with/