Minimal handling of union types for pydantic (#91)

This adds minimal handling and safeguards for Union type when working with pydantic models.

kor/adapters.py

@@ -1,12 +1,29 @@
 """Adapters to convert from validation frameworks to Kor internal representation."""
 import enum
-from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Sequence, Tuple, Type, Union, get_origin
+from typing import (
+    Any,
+    Dict,
+    List,
+    Optional,
+    Sequence,
+    Tuple,
+    Type,
+    Union,
+    get_args,
+    get_origin,
+)
 
 from pydantic import BaseModel
 
 from .nodes import ExtractionSchemaNode, Number, Object, Option, Selection, Text
 from .validators import PydanticValidator, Validator
 
+# Not going to support dicts or lists since that requires recursive checks.
+# May make sense to either drop the internal representation, or properly extend it
+# to handle Lists, Unions etc.
+# Not worth the effort, until it's clear that folks are using this functionality.
+PRIMITIVE_TYPES = {str, float, int, type(None)}
+
 
 def _translate_pydantic_to_kor(
     model_class: Type[BaseModel],
@@ -43,17 +60,32 @@ def _translate_pydantic_to_kor(
         type_ = field.type_
         field_many = get_origin(field.outer_type_) is list
         attribute: Union[ExtractionSchemaNode, Selection, "Object"]
-        if issubclass(type_, BaseModel):
-            attribute = _translate_pydantic_to_kor(
-                type_,
-                description=field_description,
+        # Precedence matters here since bool is a subclass of int
+        if get_origin(type_) is Union:
+            args = get_args(type_)
+
+            if not all(arg in PRIMITIVE_TYPES for arg in args):
+                raise NotImplementedError(
+                    "Union of non-primitive types not supported. Issue with"
+                    f"field: `{field_name}`. Has type: `{type_}`"
+                )
+
+            attribute = Text(
+                id=field_name,
                 examples=field_examples,
+                description=field_description,
                 many=field_many,
-                name=field_name,
             )
         else:
-            # Precedence matters here since bool is a subclass of int
-            if issubclass(type_, bool):
+            if issubclass(type_, BaseModel):
+                attribute = _translate_pydantic_to_kor(
+                    type_,
+                    description=field_description,
+                    examples=field_examples,
+                    many=field_many,
+                    name=field_name,
+                )
+            elif issubclass(type_, bool):
                 attribute = Text(
                     id=field_name,
                     examples=field_examples,

tests/test_adpaters.py → tests/test_adapters.py

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 import enum
+from typing import Union
 
 import pydantic
+import pytest
 from pydantic.fields import Field
 
 from kor.adapters import _translate_pydantic_to_kor, from_pydantic
@@ -93,6 +95,43 @@ class Toy(pydantic.BaseModel):
     )
 
 
+def test_convert_pydantic_with_union() -> None:
+    """Test behavior with Union field."""
+
+    class Toy(pydantic.BaseModel):
+        """Toy pydantic object."""
+
+        a: Union[int, float, None]
+
+    node = _translate_pydantic_to_kor(Toy)
+    assert node == Object(
+        id="toy",
+        attributes=[
+            Text(
+                # Any union type of primitives is mapped to a text field for now.
+                id="a"
+            ),
+        ],
+    )
+
+
+def test_convert_pydantic_with_complex_union() -> None:
+    """Test behavior with Union field that has nested pydantic objects."""
+
+    class Child(pydantic.BaseModel):
+        """Child pydantic object."""
+
+        y: str
+
+    class ModelWithComplexUnion(pydantic.BaseModel):
+        """Model that has a union with a pydantic object."""
+
+        x: Union[Child, int]
+
+    with pytest.raises(NotImplementedError):
+        _translate_pydantic_to_kor(ModelWithComplexUnion)
+
+
 def test_from_pydantic() -> None:
     """Test from pydantic function."""