-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix case where absolute nodes would sometimes not be cloned #45240
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D59175629 |
Base commit: e35a2f4 |
…#45240) Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#45240 X-link: facebook/yoga#1675 There was a bug where some crash would happen if a tree was cloned that had static/absolute parent/child pair inside it. This was because we were no longer calling `cloneChildrenIfNeeded` on the static parent, but would still layout the absolute child. So that child's owner would be stale and have new layout. In React Native this would lead to a failed assert which causes the crash. The fix here is to clone the children of static nodes during `layoutAbsoluteDescendants` so that we guarantee the node is either cloned if it is going to have new layout. Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D59175629
joevilches
added a commit
to joevilches/yoga
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2024
…#1675) Summary: X-link: facebook/react-native#45240 Pull Request resolved: facebook#1675 There was a bug where some crash would happen if a tree was cloned that had static/absolute parent/child pair inside it. This was because we were no longer calling `cloneChildrenIfNeeded` on the static parent, but would still layout the absolute child. So that child's owner would be stale and have new layout. In React Native this would lead to a failed assert which causes the crash. The fix here is to clone the children of static nodes during `layoutAbsoluteDescendants` so that we guarantee the node is either cloned if it is going to have new layout. Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D59175629
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D59175629 |
13ca37d
to
a727637
Compare
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
to facebook/litho
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2024
Summary: X-link: facebook/react-native#45240 X-link: facebook/yoga#1675 There was a bug where some crash would happen if a tree was cloned that had static/absolute parent/child pair inside it. This was because we were no longer calling `cloneChildrenIfNeeded` on the static parent, but would still layout the absolute child. So that child's owner would be stale and have new layout. In React Native this would lead to a failed assert which causes the crash. The fix here is to clone the children of static nodes during `layoutAbsoluteDescendants` so that we guarantee the node is either cloned if it is going to have new layout. Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D59175629 fbshipit-source-id: 4d110a08ba5368704327d5ab69a8695b28e746f4
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
to facebook/yoga
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2024
Summary: X-link: facebook/react-native#45240 Pull Request resolved: #1675 There was a bug where some crash would happen if a tree was cloned that had static/absolute parent/child pair inside it. This was because we were no longer calling `cloneChildrenIfNeeded` on the static parent, but would still layout the absolute child. So that child's owner would be stale and have new layout. In React Native this would lead to a failed assert which causes the crash. The fix here is to clone the children of static nodes during `layoutAbsoluteDescendants` so that we guarantee the node is either cloned if it is going to have new layout. Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D59175629 fbshipit-source-id: 4d110a08ba5368704327d5ab69a8695b28e746f4
This pull request has been merged in c247e8c. |
This pull request was successfully merged by @joevilches in c247e8c. When will my fix make it into a release? | How to file a pick request? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
fb-exported
Merged
This PR has been merged.
p: Facebook
Partner: Facebook
Partner
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
There was a bug where some crash would happen if a tree was cloned that had static/absolute parent/child pair inside it. This was because we were no longer calling
cloneChildrenIfNeeded
on the static parent, but would still layout the absolute child. So that child's owner would be stale and have new layout. In React Native this would lead to a failed assert which causes the crash.The fix here is to clone the children of static nodes during
layoutAbsoluteDescendants
so that we guarantee the node is either cloned if it is going to have new layout.Differential Revision: D59175629