Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cluster builder interface and updated output #1089

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

dhavalpatel624624
Copy link

Project Robyn

Generated cluster builder interface which will cluster models and updated the clustering_result dataclass for outputs

No testing needed at this point

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 24, 2024
@dhavalpatel624624 dhavalpatel624624 marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 22:00
Copy link

@alxlyj alxlyj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

few comments primarily on namings and refactoring for visualization. we can look into getting rid of the older clustering interfaces in our next iteration.

python/src/robyn/modeling/clustering/cluster_builder.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/src/robyn/modeling/clustering/cluster_builder.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/src/robyn/modeling/entities/clustering_results.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/src/robyn/modeling/entities/clustering_results.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/src/robyn/modeling/entities/clustering_results.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sumane81
Copy link

sumane81 commented Oct 25, 2024

I asked AI to review the code for me.


I'll review cluster_builder.py and clustering_results.py focusing on code structure, encapsulation, type safety and proper initialization. Let me analyze each file and suggest improvements.

First, let's examine clustering_results.py:

Key improvements to clustering_results.py:

  1. Added frozen=True to make dataclasses immutable
  2. Added proper type annotations for all attributes
  3. Used field(default_factory=...) for mutable defaults
  4. Added comprehensive docstrings
  5. Made all dataclasses properly initialized with defaults

Now let's examine cluster_builder.py. This class has multiple responsibilities and should be split up:

Key improvements to cluster_builder.py:

  1. Split into specialized classes following Single Responsibility Principle:

    • DataPreprocessor: Handles data preparation
    • ClusterAnalyzer: Performs statistical analysis
    • ConfidenceIntervalCalculator: Calculates confidence intervals
    • ClusterBuilder: Coordinates the overall process
  2. Improved encapsulation:

    • Made internal methods private with underscore prefix
    • Added proper type hints
    • Used dataclasses for data structures
    • Protected internal state
  3. Better organization:

    • Each class has a single, clear responsibility
    • Methods are focused and cohesive
    • Clear separation of concerns
  4. Additional improvements:

    • Added comprehensive docstrings
    • Made method signatures explicit
    • Used proper type annotations throughout
    • Made the code more maintainable and testable

The refactored code is now:

  1. More maintainable due to clear separation of concerns
  2. More robust with proper type checking
  3. Better encapsulated with clear public/private interfaces
  4. Easier to test due to smaller, focused classes
  5. More flexible for future modifications
    cluster-builder-refactor.MD
    clustering-results-refactor.MD

Attached refactored code. Change .MD extension to .py

Review refactored code and use whatever is applicable.

Copy link

@sumane81 sumane81 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@dhavalpatel624624 dhavalpatel624624 merged commit a1a5679 into robynpy_release Oct 25, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants