generated from falcosecurity/template-repository
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added an event for default rule "Detect outbound connections to common miner pool ports" #176
Open
GLVSKiriti
wants to merge
2
commits into
falcosecurity:main
Choose a base branch
from
GLVSKiriti:DetectOutboundConnectionsToCommonMinerPoolPorts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+36
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions
36
events/syscall/detect_outbound_connections_to_common_miner_pool_ports.go
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
/* | ||
Copyright (C) 2024 The Falco Authors. | ||
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package syscall | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"os/exec" | ||
|
||
"github.com/falcosecurity/event-generator/events" | ||
) | ||
|
||
var _ = events.Register( | ||
DetectOutboundConnectionsToCommonMinerPoolPorts, | ||
events.WithDisabled(), // this rules is not included in falco_rules.yaml (stable rules), so disable the action | ||
) | ||
|
||
func DetectOutboundConnectionsToCommonMinerPoolPorts(h events.Helper) error { | ||
curl, err := exec.LookPath("curl") | ||
if err != nil { | ||
h.Log().Warnf("Curl is needed to launch this action") | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
cmd := exec.Command(curl, "http://mine.moneropool.com") | ||
return cmd.Run() | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mmh is GETting this link safe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dont have an idea about that . I executed in my system 🙃
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @leogr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regardless if it's safe or not, this approach will make the action unpredictable (that worries me more).
Are there any alternative approaches that do not involve talking with external servers? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@FedeDP @leogr if we are worrying about this
then why cant we follow this approach i.e, let us add any example domain in the rule here, which can be used for testing purposes. So after that we can curl example.com which triggers the rule and safe to GET the request. WDYT? about this approach. IMO instead of curling the suspicious domains we can do this which will be beneficial for testing purposes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry. I had lost track of this. Anyway, adding
example.com
to the list does not seem a viable option to me since it may increase false positives.