new(tests): add a new test for execveat with AT_EMPTY_PATH

[Andreagit97]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area tests

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

No

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds a new test for execveat with AT_EMPTY_PATH flag

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[github-actions]

Perf diff from master - unit tests

     2.87%     -1.22%  [.] scap_event_decode_params
     2.76%     +1.14%  [.] sinsp_thread_manager::get_thread_ref
     6.31%     -1.14%  [.] next
    10.60%     -0.74%  [.] sinsp_parser::reset
     0.22%     +0.72%  [.] std::vector<sinsp_evt_param, std::allocator<sinsp_evt_param> >::emplace_back<sinsp_evt*, unsigned int&, char const*, unsigned long&>
     2.88%     +0.67%  [.] sinsp_thread_manager::find_thread
     0.66%     +0.60%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::parse_field_name
     0.62%     -0.47%  [.] std::_Hashtable<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, libsinsp::state::dynamic_struct::field_info>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, libsinsp::state::dynamic_struct::field_info> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::hash<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::_M_insert_unique_node
     0.56%     -0.47%  [.] sinsp_thread_manager::new_fdinfo
     1.58%     +0.44%  [.] libsinsp::sinsp_suppress::process_event

Perf diff from master - scap file

     4.67%     +7.07%  [.] gzfile_read
    20.17%     -6.60%  [.] sinsp_filter_check_event::extract_single
    15.34%     -4.40%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::get_field_info
    10.09%     +2.55%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::rawval_to_string
     5.49%     +2.32%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::get_transformed_field_info
    11.64%     -0.40%  [.] sinsp_filter_check_thread::extract_single
     6.25%     -0.40%  [.] rawstring_check::extract_single
     5.96%     -0.26%  [.] sinsp_filter_check_container::extract_single
     5.05%     +0.13%  [.] libsinsp::runc::match_container_id
     5.11%     -0.11%  [.] 0x00000000000a7cf0

Heap diff from master - unit tests

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Heap diff from master - scap file

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.08%. Comparing base (686dfc0) to head (c47ab79).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2002   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.08%   74.08%           
=======================================
  Files         253      253           
  Lines       30766    30766           
  Branches     5386     5414   +28     
=======================================
  Hits        22792    22792           
- Misses       7946     7974   +28     
+ Partials       28        0   -28     

Flag	Coverage Δ
libsinsp	74.08% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[incertum]

Thanks!

/approve

[poiana]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c2e5ec401700ec71fc6fbbe74515f55d329d3eb4

[FedeDP]

/approve

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, incertum

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Andreagit97,FedeDP,incertum]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment