-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate target environments #2806
Open
itowlson
wants to merge
11
commits into
fermyon:main
Choose a base branch
from
itowlson:validate-target-environment
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,991
−598
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
42f9d82
Validate against target environments during build
itowlson 3baee56
Load and compose components once at start of validation
itowlson fd45f2f
WIT-based environment syntax
itowlson cadbf91
Less meaningless error messages
itowlson cd1c3cc
Enable skipping target validation for offline or to bypass delays
itowlson 897e4dd
Report all target validation fails not just the first
itowlson bc2cc17
Updated after initial review
itowlson 68fbd1a
Encapsulate the application and loader
itowlson 76cb8af
Load target env from other registry or local dir
itowlson 2a3a213
Cache environment definitions
itowlson 6d068a4
Use Till's lockfile
itowlson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW: I'm never against replacing
bool
with a more descriptivebool
-likeenum
:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nor am I @rylev! But in this case the only thing ever passed to it (except in a couple of tests) was
BuildCommand::skip_target_checks
(which itself emerged from clap magic) and so I didn't feel a self-descriptive enum added enough value. I agree that by default we should avoid bare booleans (and I'd want to revisit it if the function sprouted more boolean args), but in this case it didn't seem worth the candle? I am happy to be overruled.