New: Add assertTableFilterHidden and assertTableFilterVisible test methods
#15310
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chester-sykes
changed the title
assertTableFilterHidden and assertTableFilterVisible test methodsassertTableFilterHidden and assertTableFilterVisible test methods
… in a `$withHidden` variable instead
danharrin
reviewed
Jan 10, 2025
danharrin
reviewed
Jan 10, 2025
danharrin
requested changes
Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR allows you to test if a filter is visiable, like you can do with
assertTableColumnVisibleandassertTableColumnHidden.I've had to refactor the
getFiltersandgetFilterfunctions to allow you to pass in a$withHiddenvariable to just return all the filters without the scope ofisVisible().Visual changes
No visual changes.
Functional changes
composer cscommand.