texlive & texlive-texmf added variants of macOS 15, removing luajittex and luajithbtex

[sth0]

Removed from x86_64 systems where programs seg fault for both livetex and livetex-texmf. Updated checksum type for livetex-texmf.info

Tested on macOS 15 arm64 which compiles correctly. Tested on macOS 10.14 and works but no changes there.

[dhomeier]

Thanks! With the 3 changes I suggested this passes all tests on 15.1/Rosetta, which seems to show the same segfaults as x86_64 native otherwise.

[dhomeier]

I got the same(?) failures on Sonoma 14.7.1; cloning the *-15.0.info files for a Distribution: 14.0 copy let all (remaining) tests pass.
test-suite.log

[sth0]

I believe it, but I successfully build texlive on 14.7 but with Xcode 15 instead of 16. I believe it is an Xcode version sensitivity not an OS version, but I don't know how to restrict the packages by Xcode version.

[nieder]

There's no way to restrict by Xcode version besides putting a versioned BuildDepends. In those cases, however, the package would still be visible, but would error out immediately because the versioned BuildDepends would not be satisfied (so not a good solution here).
@dhomeier your 14.7.1/x86_64 failures are also with Xcode16?
If so, it looks like we would need to make 14.0.info files as well. Unfortunately, Distribution: doesn't take ranges and the validator will complain if a texlive-15.0.info file is also marked for 14.0 :(

[dhomeier]

@dhomeier your 14.7.1/x86_64 failures are also with Xcode16?

Yes, since the Xcode 16 update a lot of the same failures popped up as on Sequoia.

If so, it looks like we would need to make 14.0.info files as well. Unfortunately, Distribution: doesn't take ranges and the validator will complain if a texlive-15.0.info file is also marked for 14.0 :(

Yea, hit by that rather badly for the gcc packages, which need separate files for everything from 13.0 upwards... :-/