Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Github Actions workflow to use macOS 13 #74

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

justanwar
Copy link
Member

@justanwar justanwar commented Dec 19, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file and the Trezor plugin in the Electrum Dash project. The workflow update focuses on upgrading the macOS build environment from version 12 to 13, while the Trezor plugin changes involve refining transaction input and output handling. The modifications aim to improve build processes and enhance the plugin's transaction processing logic with more precise input and output management.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build_release.yml Updated macOS build environment from macos-12 to macos-13
electrum_dash/plugins/trezor/trezor.py - Modified tx_inputs method to use txin.prevout.out_idx instead of txin.nsequence
- Updated tx_outputs method with new conditional logic for output creation
- Improved error handling in create_client method

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Plugin as TrezorPlugin
    participant Transaction as Transaction
    participant Keystore as TrezorKeyStore

    Plugin->>Transaction: tx_inputs()
    Plugin->>Transaction: tx_outputs()
    Transaction-->>Keystore: Process inputs/outputs
    Keystore-->>Plugin: Return processed transaction details
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Code Refinement 🛠️

MacOS rises, version thirteen's might,
Trezor's logic dancing with delight,
Inputs and outputs, now more precise,
Workflow humming, smooth as rabbit's slice!
Electrum Dash, your changes shine so bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b99e959 and 79888a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/build_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • electrum_dash/plugins/trezor/trezor.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build_release.yml (1)

85-85: LGTM! Verify build outputs after upgrading macOS runner.

The upgrade from macos-12 to macos-13 is a good improvement that provides access to newer build tools. However, it's important to verify that the built artifacts work as expected on different macOS versions.

✅ Verification successful

Build compatibility verified with macOS deployment target 10.13

Based on the codebase analysis, the upgrade to macos-13 runner is safe as the project maintains compatibility with macOS 10.13 and above. Key findings:

  • The minimum macOS version is explicitly set to 10.13 in multiple build scripts via MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET
  • The make_zbar.sh script has specific macOS build configurations that are version-independent
  • No macOS version-specific dependencies or configurations were found that would be impacted by the runner upgrade
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any macOS version specific dependencies or configurations

# Look for macOS version specific configurations or dependencies
rg -i "macos.*1[2-3]|ventura|monterey" 

# Look for potential build script dependencies on macOS version
fd -e sh -e bash . -x grep -l -i "macos"

Length of output: 806


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of build scripts that have macOS dependencies
cat contrib/build_tools_util.sh contrib/make_zbar.sh contrib/make_libsecp256k1.sh

# Check the GitHub workflow file for any other macOS version dependencies
cat .github/workflows/build_release.yml

# Look for any minimum macOS version requirements in package configs
fd -e plist -e json -e xml . -x grep -l -i "macos\|deployment"

Length of output: 14043

electrum_dash/plugins/trezor/trezor.py (1)

382-382: LGTM! Verify coinbase transaction handling.

The change from txin.nsequence to txin.prevout.out_idx for determining the previous output index in coinbase inputs is correct. The nsequence field is meant for other purposes like Replace-by-Fee or timelock features, while prevout.out_idx directly represents the output index.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about coinbase transaction handling across the codebase:

Coinbase transaction handling is correctly implemented

The codebase shows consistent and proper handling of coinbase transactions:

  • The prevout.out_idx is correctly used for coinbase transactions in Trezor plugin, with special handling for legacy coinbase transactions that have script_sig starting with \xc4 and nsequence == 0xffffffff
  • Other hardware wallet plugins (KeepKey, Safe-T, Ledger) also properly handle coinbase transactions with appropriate index values
  • The wallet database and synchronizer components correctly track coinbase outputs and their maturity
  • Transaction validation properly identifies and processes coinbase inputs via is_coinbase_input() method
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for coinbase transaction handling across the codebase

# Look for coinbase transaction test cases
rg -A 5 "is_coinbase|coinbase.*input"

# Check for any other places handling coinbase transactions
ast-grep --pattern 'if $_.is_coinbase_input():
  $$$
'

Length of output: 26479


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@justanwar justanwar merged commit ee1aa92 into master Dec 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@justanwar justanwar deleted the macos-13 branch December 19, 2024 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants