Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Lucene compliant regex filter expression #675

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

djkhl
Copy link
Collaborator

@djkhl djkhl commented Sep 26, 2024

closes #551

@fabian-moessner fabian-moessner removed the request for review from ekneg54 October 25, 2024 11:01
@fabian-moessner fabian-moessner marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2024 09:11
@fabian-moessner fabian-moessner force-pushed the dev-add-lucene-regex-compliance branch from aca1681 to 6675c41 Compare October 28, 2024 11:34
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.33%. Comparing base (eca9240) to head (42bf7d2).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #675      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.27%   94.33%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         146      146              
  Lines        9777     9819      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits         9217     9263      +46     
+ Misses        560      556       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fabian-moessner fabian-moessner merged commit 1a42a12 into main Oct 29, 2024
13 checks passed
@fabian-moessner fabian-moessner deleted the dev-add-lucene-regex-compliance branch October 29, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reimplement regex filters with lucene compliant syntax
4 participants