-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: initial commit for rust evaluator client side #2322
Conversation
Uffizzi Preview |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## client-eval #2322 +/- ##
==============================================
Coverage ? 70.79%
==============================================
Files ? 78
Lines ? 7462
Branches ? 0
==============================================
Hits ? 5283
Misses ? 1878
Partials ? 301 📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lookin great just some quick observations while on mobile
c9fddbe
to
249bdb6
Compare
8a2ea41
to
add51d2
Compare
…pstream Flipt instance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couple comments, looking great!
@@ -0,0 +1,899 @@ | |||
use chrono::{DateTime, Utc}; | |||
use snafu::{prelude::*, Whatever}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any reason of using snafu
over anyhow? I know we use anyhow in our flipt-rust
lib, might be nice to consolidate on one
actually I know @brettbuddin mentioned we should create proper error types instead for public facing API (still a TODO in the flipt-rust
lib) but wondering if we should create our own errors before this goes GA https://fettblog.eu/rust-error-handling/#custom-errors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markphelps @yquansah Yeah, I used anyhow
in that library, because it was kind of a sketch, but long-term I think you'll need to move away from it. Here's what anyhow
docs say in comparing to thiserror
:
Use Anyhow if you don't care what error type your functions return, you just want it to be easy. This is common in application code. Use thiserror if you are a library that wants to design your own dedicated error type(s) so that on failures the caller gets exactly the information that you choose.
The general guideline at that time (could be an outdated perspective) is to use anyhow
for applications where users will see errors, but not interrogate them programatically. Libraries might be different, because the error values might be structured information (e.g. nested errors) that needs to be interrogated—in which case use an error crate that supports that attitude.
@@ -0,0 +1,1340 @@ | |||
# This file is automatically @generated by Cargo. | |||
# It is not intended for manual editing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need this in version control? https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/faq.html#why-do-binaries-have-cargolock-in-version-control-but-not-libraries
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markphelps Hmmm maybe not. Thank you for the tip!
} | ||
|
||
pub fn replace_snapshot(&mut self) { | ||
let _w_lock = self.mtx.write().unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we do something else instead of panicking if acquiring these locks fail? perhaps this is good for now, but might want to rethink in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markphelps Yeah I tried to remove most of these unwraps as possible. We could probably handle this more gracefully.
* feat: Evaluation snapshot service (#2330) * chore(wip): gah * feat(wip): snapshot api * feat: finish proto server * chore: fix linter errors * chore: move * chore: fix build * chore: add ability to skip generating sdks * chore: dont generate interface method * chore: fix build * fix: mount api * chore: add namespace key to resp * chore: detect boolean flag types * chore: create own types for evaluation service * chore: rm spaces * chore: rename cmp type fields --------- Co-authored-by: Yoofi Quansah <[email protected]> * feat: initial commit for rust evaluator client side (#2322) * feat: initial commit for rust evaluator client side * chore: rename of entire directory tree * chore: write tests for all the matches constraints types * chore: redo gitignore * chore: format rust code * chore: use generic instead of parameter impl * chore: remove println! statement * feat: support variant attachment as String type Rust * feat: new engine logic * chore: fix unwrap by using match instead * chore: add boolean method to engine and format code * feat: add request logic for getting document text from configurable upstream Flipt instance * chore: apply cargo clippy updates * feat: add three basic functions for allocating engine and retrieving it * chore: remove TODO * feat: modify code to adapt to endpoint * chore: use environment variables to get update interval * chore: remove unnecessary clone * chore: add rust workspace * chore: update enums * chore: impl default for responses * chore: make constants * feat: Add changes for FFI boundaries and example code --------- Co-authored-by: Mark Phelps <[email protected]> * chore: engine model refactor (#2356) * chore: refactor model layout; fix duration bug * chore: rename get_duration to get_duration_millis * feat: add boolean exported unsafe FFI function and couple other fixes (#2357) Co-authored-by: Mark Phelps <[email protected]> * chore: restructure client eval (#2362) * feat: add initial commit for Python evaluation client using Rust core (#2358) * feat: add initial commit for Python evaluation client using Rust core * chore: fix README linting issue * feat: move python source code and project under sdk * chore: clean up Python client README.md and change ENGINE_LIB_PATH meaning * chore: fix suggestions on PR * feat: achieve unit test parity with Golang evaluator on Rust core (#2392) * feat: add integration style tests for evaluation * feat: add evaluatortest parity with Golang evaluator on Rust core engine * chore: use mockall as dev dependency and attribute TestParser as only being used during tests * feat: add initial commit for flipt-client-go evaluation client (#2390) * feat: add initial commit for flipt-client-go evaluation client * chore: fix README.md * chore: README updates based on suggestions * chore: only support one namespace for Golang client * chore: add to go.work * chore: mod tidy * feat: incorporate error handling from Rust core over FFI to clients (#2400) * chore: Rm clients in monorepo (#2407) * chore: rm clients as they are moving to seperate repo * chore: rm go client sdk * chore: remove unused bits from .gitignore around Rust and Python and change go.work version back to 1.21 * chore: mod tidy --------- Co-authored-by: Yoofi Quansah <[email protected]>
Rust engine for client side evaluation.
The idea of this is for clients to embed the Rust implementation and get an evaluation response by providing a
namespace_key
,flag_key
,context
, andentity_id
.