Skip to content

Conversation

douglasawh
Copy link

This is a pretty massive change in the way the plugin works. Sticking this at the bottom in a foot note does not seem appropriate.

The decision to do this initially does make some sense, as 3.1 is not going to be the version that everyone is using. However, over time, this will come to be the dominant behavior, and that behavior should be made clear to the users.

This is a pretty massive change in the way the plugin works. Sticking this at the bottom in a foot note does not seem appropriate.

The decision to do this initially does make some sense, as 3.1 is not going to be the version that everyone is using. However, over time, this will come to be the dominant behavior, and that behavior should be made clear to the users.

Signed-off-by: Doug Whitfield <[email protected]>
@douglasawh douglasawh requested review from a team as code owners August 29, 2024 14:59
Copy link
Contributor

@lockewritesdocs lockewritesdocs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution @douglasawh! I suggested some editorial changes to incorporate.

This language much better than my original PR. All I *had* done is take what was in there, reformat it slightly, and move it to the top.

Co-authored-by: Adam Locke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Doug Whitfield <[email protected]>
@lecaros
Copy link
Contributor

lecaros commented Aug 30, 2024

Hi @douglasawh,
thanks for your submission.
Could you please review our contributing guidelines and adhere to them? After that, we'll gladly merge your contribution.

Thanks

@lecaros lecaros added waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes dco DCO failing labels Aug 30, 2024
@douglasawh douglasawh changed the title Update kubernetes-events.md Make the 3.1 notes more prominent in kubernetes-events.md as this is a breaking change Aug 30, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Mar 26, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Oct 1, 2025
@eschabell eschabell self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell eschabell added conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor and removed dco DCO failing labels Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell
Copy link
Collaborator

@douglasawh can you please fix the conflicts here so I can merge for you?

@esmerel esmerel removed conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes labels Oct 21, 2025
@esmerel
Copy link
Contributor

esmerel commented Oct 21, 2025

The conflicts were due to formatting changes for style, I went ahead and fixed the conflicts in the interest of keeping things moving.

@patrick-stephens
Copy link
Contributor

The DCO failure is a hard block

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants