Added new page under Data types and IO section for tensorflow_types in flyte documentation

[sumana-2705]

Tracking issue

Closes #4065

Why are the changes needed?

• User Understanding: Enhances clarity on how to use TensorFlow types within Flyte.
• Integration Guidance: Provides step-by-step instructions for integrating TensorFlow models and datasets.
• Error Reduction: Helps users avoid common pitfalls and integration errors.
• Improved Documentation: Fills a gap in the existing documentation for better usability.
• Increased Efficiency: Streamlines the workflow for users working with TensorFlow in Flyte.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR introduces a new page in the Data Types and IO section of the user guide, documenting all available TensorFlow types in Flyte. It includes detailed explanations of the TensorFlowModel, TFRecordFile, and TFRecordsDirectory, along with the TFRecordDatasetConfig configuration class.

Check all the applicable boxes

• I updated the documentation accordingly.
• All commits are signed-off.

Docs link

Data Types and IO

[welcome]

Thank you for opening this pull request! 🙌

These tips will help get your PR across the finish line:

• Most of the repos have a PR template; if not, fill it out to the best of your knowledge.
• Sign off your commits (Reference: DCO Guide).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (2b0af2b) to head (4524897).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5807      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1309     1309              
  Lines      130994   130994              
==========================================
- Hits        48271    48268       -3     
- Misses      78533    78536       +3     
  Partials     4190     4190              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.10% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytecopilot	11.73% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl	62.40% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests-flyteidl	6.92% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.64% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller	43.02% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib	55.41% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[davidmirror-ops]

@neverett do you think the failing test here has to do with content relocation?

[neverett]

@davidmirror-ops I don't think so, since the "Data types and I/O" section wasn't moved as part of the Flyte docs overhaul. It looks like the readthedocs test is passing and a bunch of other tests are pending -- can you point me to the test failure you're seeing?

[davidmirror-ops]

Thank you!

[sumana-2705]

@davidmirror-ops I'm so sorry, I have just tried to fix the errors in the tests. I don't know that it would cancel the approval. I'm unaware of that. Please don't mind my mistake.

[neverett]

Added a few suggestions, but otherwise this looks good to me. Feel free to request another review from me after you're done making changes!

[sumana-2705]

@neverett I have included the changes can you please review it now.

[sumana-2705]

@davidmirror-ops, I have updated my forked repository to the latest commits; could you please proceed with merging this PR?