Adds more flexibility in the aperiodic/oscillatory fitting #147
+53
−13
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DESCRIPTION:
I have added a keyword
ap_range
to the FOOOF.fit() function.When
ap_range
is specified, the already existingfreq_range
keywordis used to determine the frequencies for the oscillatory fits while the
ap_range keyword is used for the aperiodic fit. When it is not
specified, everything proceeds as before.
This allows the two parts FO and OOF to be more-or-less independent of
one another if so-desired.
Furthermore, the
ap_range
keyword may also be a set of indices inorder to allow for a very simple implementation of exclusion zones.
Update: I have added support for these keyword options in the FOOOFGroup.fit() function.
TESTING:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cb48/7cb4832f7671f4886eeb8adc5c4be074bbf0a494" alt="Screenshot_2019-08-22_16-22-46"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f528a/f528ab87e3c175c83f9d38302f78ddfec873638c" alt="Screenshot_2019-08-22_16-05-29"
Tested on ~100 different EEG files, no errors unless inputs are the wrong
size.