Missing PackagesFirewallPolicyBlock methods #8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
June 19, 2023 16:29
|
Hello fortinetdev Team, Could you please let us know if extending Terraform support for Policy Blocks is feasible? Ideally, all available APIs should be supported. Best regards, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
This Pull Request is in reference to Support Ticket #8512414 [EFN]. It introduces modifications to the Fortinet SDK to enhance support for the Fortimanager Terraform provider, enabling the creation of policies inside the policy block.
Central to these modifications is the addition of missing functions that form the crux of this new functionality. For a detailed view of these changes, please review the updates in fortimanager2/sdkcore/sdkfos.go.
These changes aim to accommodate and streamline the process of policy creation within the policy block, deviating from the conventional policy package creation method, thus extending the flexibility and capability of the Terraform provider.
The remaining changes might appear unrelated but were essential for the compilation of a new custom provider: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/romanromanovv/fortimanager/latest. Although these alterations do not directly impact the policy block functionality, they were necessary for the broader functionality of the new custom provider.
I am open to discussing this implementation further and would appreciate your feedback. Please feel free to share your comments or questions on this matter.
Thank you for your attention and understanding.
Best Regards,