Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronous clients' threading.Lock were replaced by threading.RLock #228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2023

Conversation

francis-clairicia
Copy link
Owner

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia commented Dec 31, 2023

This happened in PR #135

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia added bug Something isn't working topic-client Relative to client implementations labels Dec 31, 2023
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia self-assigned this Dec 31, 2023
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia changed the title Synchronous clients' threading.Lock were replaced by threading.RLock in #135 Synchronous clients' threading.Lock were replaced by threading.RLock Dec 31, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b6e5f23) 100.00% compared to head (0cb93e7) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
OS-Linux 85.50% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Windows 85.02% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
OS-macOS 85.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11 99.82% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.12 99.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
test-functional 85.77% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
test-unit 84.20% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia merged commit bf586d6 into main Dec 31, 2023
19 checks passed
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia deleted the fix/clients/locks branch December 31, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working topic-client Relative to client implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant